ArticleAmerican heart journal2014
Designing effective drug and device development programs for hospitalized heart failure: a proposal for pretrial registries.
Article in American heart journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Globalization of heart failure clinical trials: a systematic review of 305 trials conducted over 16 years.European journal of heart failure · 2018Pooled it
- Relationship Between Enrolling Country Income Level and Patient Profile, Protocol Completion, and Trial End Points.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2018Observational
- Evolving Landscape of Clinical Trials in Heart Failure: Patient Populations, Endpoint Selection, and Regions of Enrollment.Current heart failure reports · 2018Review
- Impact of Site Selection and Study Conduct on Outcomes in Global Clinical Trials.Current heart failure reports · 2017Review
- Global Variations in Patient Populations and Outcomes in Heart Failure Clinical Trials.Current heart failure reports · 2017Review
- Site selection for heart failure clinical trials in the USA.Heart failure reviews · 2015Article
- Clinical trials in hospitalized heart failure patients: targeting interventions to optimal phenotypic subpopulations.Heart failure reviews · 2015Review
- International REgistry to assess medical Practice with lOngitudinal obseRvation for Treatment of Heart Failure (REPORT-HF): rationale for and design of a global registry.European journal of heart failure · 2015Observational
- Improving Postdischarge Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure.American journal of therapeuticsReview
- Mihai Gheorghiade, MD-Life and Concepts.American journal of therapeuticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent international phase III clinical trials of novel therapies for hospitalized heart failure (HHF) have failed to improve the unacceptably high postdischarge event rate. These large studies have demonstrated notable geographic and site-specific variation in patient profiles and enrollment. Possible contributors to the lack of success in HHF outcome trials include challenges in selecting clinical sites capable of (1) providing adequate numbers of appropriately selected patients and (2) properly executing the study protocol. We propose a "pretrial registry" as a novel tool for improving the efficiency and quality of international HHF trials by focusing on the selection and cultivation of high-quality sites. A pretrial registry may help assess a site's ability to achieve adequate enrollment of the target patient population, integrate protocol requirements into clinical workflow, and accomplish appropriate follow-up. Although such a process would be associated with additional upfront resource investment, this appropriation may be modest in comparison with the downstream costs associated with maintenance of poorly performing sites, failed clinical trials, and the global health and economic burden of HHF. This review is based on discussions between scientists, clinical trialists, and regulatory representatives regarding methods for improving international HHF trials that took place at the United States Food and Drug Administration on January 12th, 2012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.