ArticleDrug and alcohol review2015
Crack pipe sharing among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The utilization and delivery of safer smoking practices and services: a narrative synthesis of the literature.Harm reduction journal · 2023Pooled it
- Innovation, respiration and drug paraphernalia policy: a mixed methods study of crack pipe practice and respiratory harm in England.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Crack-cocaine use practices, harms and respiratory problems: an analysis of gender differences using data from a cross-sectional survey in England.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Safe inhalation pipe provision (SIPP): protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of an intervention to improve health outcomes and service engagement among people who use crack cocaine in England.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- An urgent impetus for action: safe inhalation interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission and fatality risk among people who smoke crack cocaine in the United Kingdom.The International journal on drug policy · 2020Article
- From opiates to methamphetamine: building new harm reduction responses in Jakarta, Indonesia.Harm reduction journal · 2019Article
- Education and equipment for people who smoke crack cocaine in Canada: progress and limits.Harm reduction journal · 2017Article
- Eviction and loss of income assistance among street-involved youth in Canada.Journal of public health policy · 2016Article
- Individuals Reporting Past 3-month Smoked Stimulant Use Are Placed at Risk for Infection and Injury Amid COVID-19.Journal of addiction medicineArticle
- Un Jalón, Un Volteón, y Otra Vez: High-Risk Crack Smoking Paraphernalia in México City.Journal of psychoactive drugsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsCrack pipe sharing is a risky practice that has been associated with the transmission of hepatitis C and other harms. While previous research has exclusively focused on this phenomenon among adults, this study examines crack pipe sharing among street-involved youth. DESIGN AND
methodsFrom May 2006 to May 2012, data were collected from the At-Risk Youth Study, a cohort of street-involved youth aged 14-26 in Vancouver, Canada. Survey data from active crack smokers were analysed using generalised estimating equations logistic regression.
resultsOver the study period, 567 youth reported smoking crack cocaine and contributed 1288 observations, among which 961 (75%) included a report of crack pipe sharing. In multivariate analysis, factors that were associated with crack pipe sharing included difficulty accessing crack pipes [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.20]; homelessness (AOR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.43-2.44); regular employment (AOR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.15-2.04); daily non-injection crystal methamphetamine use (AOR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.11-3.75); daily crack smoking (AOR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.85); encounters with the police (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.01-1.99); and reporting unprotected sex (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.47-2.58). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThe prevalence of crack pipe sharing was high among our sample and independently associated with structural factors including difficulty accessing crack pipes and homelessness. Crack pipe sharing was also associated with high-intensity drug use and a number of other markers of risk and vulnerability. Collectively, these findings highlight opportunities for health services to better engage with this vulnerable group and reduce this risky behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.