Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25066122›Full record

ArticleCell reports2014

Heterogeneous tumor subpopulations cooperate to drive invasion.

Anna Chapman, Laura Fernandez del Ama, Jennifer Ferguson, Jivko Kamarashev, Claudia Wellbrock, Adam Hurlstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Small Fish, Big Answers: Zebrafish and the Molecular Drivers of Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Modeling tumors as species-rich ecological communities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. p300 KAT regulates SOX10 stability and function in human melanoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna ChapmanFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Laura Fernandez del AmaFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Jennifer FergusonFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Jivko KamarashevDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Gloriastrasse 31, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Claudia WellbrockFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. Electronic address: claudia.wellbrock@manchester.ac.uk.
Adam HurlstoneFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. Electronic address: adam.hurlstone@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16416Cancer Research UK A12724Cancer Research UK C11591/A16416Cancer Research UK C11876/A12724Wellcome Trust 097820/Z/11/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clonal selection and transcriptional reprogramming (e.g., epithelial-mesenchymal transition or phenotype switching) are the predominant theories thought to underlie tumor progression. However, a "division of labor" leading to cooperation among tumor-cell subpopulations could be an additional catalyst of progression. Using a zebrafish-melanoma xenograft model, we found that in a heterogeneous setting, inherently invasive cells, which possess protease activity and deposit extracellular matrix (ECM), co-invade with subpopulations of poorly invasive cells, a phenomenon we term "cooperative invasion". Whereas the poorly invasive cells benefit from heterogeneity, the invasive cells switch from protease-independent to an MT1-MMP-dependent mode of invasion. We did not observe changes in expression of the melanoma phenotype determinant MITF during cooperative invasion, thus ruling out the necessity for phenotype switching for invasion. Altogether, our data suggest that cooperation can drive melanoma progression without the need for clonal selection or phenotype switching and can account for the preservation of heterogeneity seen throughout tumor progression.

Indexed as

Cell MovementCellular ReprogrammingAnimalsCell Line, TumorExtracellular MatrixHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 14MelanocytesMelanomaMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorNeoplasm InvasivenessPhenotypeZebrafishMatrix Metalloproteinase 14Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID25066122
PMCPMC4542310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.