Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25065834›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2014

Influences on visit retention in clinical trials: insights from qualitative research during the VOICE trial in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Busisiwe Magazi, Jonathan Stadler, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, Elizabeth Montgomery, Florence Mathebula, Miriam Hartmann, Ariane van der Straten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Retention in theBMJ global health · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Results from a Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Demonstration Project for At-risk Cisgender Women in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Busisiwe Magazi
Jonathan StadlerWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Box 18512, Johannesburg, South Africa. Jstadler@wrhi.ac.za.
Sinead Delany-Moretlwe
Elizabeth Montgomery
Florence Mathebula
Miriam Hartmann
Ariane van der Straten
University of the Witwatersrand · ZASan Francisco AIDS Foundation · US

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Wits HIV Research Group CLINICAL TRIAL UNIT (CTU) reapplicationUM1AI069463 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI REES, HELEN, SANNE, IAN MATTHIAS · 2012 to 2025
$31.8M
University of California, Berkeley (UCB)/University of *D43TW000003 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI REINGOLD, ARTHUR L · 1988 to 2013
$16.7M
Int'l Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS)R25MH064712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINDAN, CHRISTINA P · 2002 to 2018
$3.4M
FIC NIH HHS D43TW00003NIAID NIH HHS 5UM1AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069463NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH064712NIMH NIH HHS R25MH064712-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough significant progress has been made in clinical trials of women-controlled methods of HIV prevention such as microbicides and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), low adherence to experimental study products remains a major obstacle to being able to establish their efficacy in preventing HIV infection. One factor that influences adherence is the ability of trial participants to attend regular clinic visits at which trial products are dispensed, adherence counseling is administered, and participant safety is monitored. We conducted a qualitative study of the social contextual factors that influenced adherence in the VOICE (MTN-003) trial in Johannesburg, South Africa, focusing on study participation in general, and study visits in particular.

methodsThe research used qualitative methodologies, including in-depth interviews (IDI), serial ethnographic interviews (EI), and focus group discussions (FGD) among a random sub-sample of 102 female trial participants, 18 to 40 years of age. A socio-ecological framework that explored those factors that shaped trial participation and adherence to study products, guided the analysis. Key codes were developed to standardize subsequent coding and a node search was used to identify texts relating to obstacles to visit adherence. Our analysis includes coded transcripts from seven FGD (N = 40), 41 IDI, and 64 serial EI (N = 21 women).

resultsWomen's kinship, social, and economic roles shaped their ability to participate in the clinical trial. Although participants expressed strong commitments to attend study visits, clinic visit schedules and lengthy waiting times interfered with their multiple obligations as care givers, wage earners, housekeepers, and students.

conclusionsThe research findings highlight the importance of the social context in shaping participation in HIV prevention trials, beyond focusing solely on individual characteristics. This points to the need to focus interventions to improve visit attendance by promoting a culture of active and engaged participation.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansPatient CompliancePatient DropoutsQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSouth AfricaYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID25065834
PMCPMC4115485
OpenAlexW2030975500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.