Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2015
Clinical and functional outcomes after 2 years in the early detection and intervention for the prevention of psychosis multisite effectiveness trial.
Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00531518 (Early Detection and Intervention for the Prevention of Psychosis Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Detection and Intervention for the Prevention of Psychosis Project
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality of life in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Pooled it
- Early interventions for first onset of symptoms of mental health conditions: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Review: Efficacy of preventative interventions for children and adolescents at clinical high risk of psychosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies.Child and adolescent mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Attenuated psychotic symptom interventions in youth at risk of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Clinical Effects of Mindfulness-Based Intervention in Patients With First Episode Psychosis and in Individuals With Ultra-High Risk for Transition to Psychosis: A Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Negative Symptom Interventions in Youth at Risk of Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- The effect of youth assertive community treatment: a systematic PRISMA review.BMC psychiatry · 2017Pooled it
- Effectiveness of implementing family involvement on patient outcomes in individuals with psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- A Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial of a Combined Clinical Treatment for First-Episode Psychosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Baseline psychopathology and relationship to longitudinal functional outcome in attenuated and early first episode psychosis.Schizophrenia research · 2019Trial
- From the psychosis prodrome to the first-episode of psychosis: No evidence of a cognitive decline.Journal of psychiatric research · 2018Trial
- Measuring Social and Role Recovery: Barbara Cornblatt and Colleagues' Global Functioning Scales and Their Role in Psychosocial Interventions for Clinical High-Risk and Early Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- From lived experience to leadership: establishing a stakeholder advisory board to guide first-episode psychosis research and services.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Shift in sex and age of individuals at a clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis: relation to differences in recruitment methods and effect on sample characteristics.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Clinical prediction model for transition to psychosis in individuals meeting At Risk Mental State criteria.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Relationship between social cognition and premorbid adjustment in psychosis: a systematic review.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- The Patient Journey of Schizophrenia in Mental Health Services: Results from a Co-Designed Survey by Clinicians, Expert Patients and Caregivers.Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo test effectiveness of the Early Detection, Intervention, and Prevention of Psychosis Program in preventing the onset of severe psychosis and improving functioning in a national sample of at-risk youth.
methodsIn a risk-based allocation study design, 337 youth (age 12-25) at risk of psychosis were assigned to treatment groups based on severity of positive symptoms. Those at clinically higher risk (CHR) or having an early first episode of psychosis (EFEP) were assigned to receive Family-aided Assertive Community Treatment (FACT); those at clinically lower risk (CLR) were assigned to receive community care. Between-groups differences on outcome variables were adjusted statistically according to regression-discontinuity procedures and evaluated using the Global Test Procedure that combined all symptom and functional measures.
resultsA total of 337 young people (mean age: 16.6) were assigned to the treatment group (CHR + EFEP, n = 250) or comparison group (CLR, n = 87). On the primary variable, positive symptoms, after 2 years FACT, were superior to community care (2 df, p < .0001) for both CHR (p = .0034) and EFEP (p < .0001) subgroups. Rates of conversion (6.3% CHR vs 2.3% CLR) and first negative event (25% CHR vs 22% CLR) were low but did not differ. FACT was superior in the Global Test (p = .0007; p = .024 for CHR and p = .0002 for EFEP, vs CLR) and in improvement in participation in work and school (p = .025).
conclusionFACT is effective in improving positive, negative, disorganized and general symptoms, Global Assessment of Functioning, work and school participation and global outcome in youth at risk for, or experiencing very early, psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.