Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25064615›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2015

Determinants of the prevalence of gout in the general population: a systematic review and meta-regression.

José M A Wijnands, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Kristof Thevissen, Ilja C W Arts, Pieter C Dagnelie, Coen D A Stehouwer, Sjef van der Linden, Annelies Boonen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07004231 (Using Gout Buddy to Enhance Dietary Literacy and Gout Management-A Mixed Method Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07004231 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Using Gout Buddy to Enhance Dietary Literacy and Gout Management-A Mixed Method Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2025 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsGoutArmsGOUT Buddy, an AI chatbot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Infected nasal gout tophus: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tophaceous gout of the middle ear.Journal of otology · 2019
    Article
  14. Rapid Gout Detection Method and Kit.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gout as a risk factor for osteoporosis: epidemiologic evidence from a population-based longitudinal study involving 108,060 individuals.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

José M A WijnandsDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands, j.wijnands@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Kristof Thevissen
Ilja C W Arts
Pieter C Dagnelie
Coen D A Stehouwer
Sjef van der Linden
Annelies Boonen
Maastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on the occurrence of gout show a large range in estimates. However, a clear insight into the factors responsible for this variation in estimates is lacking. Therefore, our aim was to review the literature on the prevalence and incidence of gout systematically and to obtain insight into the degree of and factors contributing to the heterogeneity. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science (January 1962 to July 2012) to identify primary studies on the prevalence and incidence of gout in the general population. Data were extracted by two persons on sources of clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity, and variation in outcome reporting. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed for the prevalence of gout. Of 1,466 articles screened, 77 articles were included, of which 71 reported the prevalence and 12 the incidence of gout. The pooled prevalence (67 studies; N = 12,226,425) based on a random effects model was 0.6% (95% CI 0.4; 0.7), however there was a high level of heterogeneity (I(2) = 99.9%). Results from a mixed-effects meta-regression model indicated that age (p = 0.019), sex (p < 0.001), continent (p < 0.001), response rate (p = 0.016), consistency in data collection (p = 0.002), and case definition (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with gout prevalence and jointly accounted for 88.7% of the heterogeneity. The incidence in the total population ranged from 0.06 to 2.68 per 1,000 person-years. In conclusion, gout is a common disease and the large variation in the prevalence data on gout is explained by sex, continent on which the study was performed, and the case definition of gout.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleGoutHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID25064615
OpenAlexW2055022313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.