Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25064425›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2014

Dynamic stability of superior vs. inferior body segments in individuals with transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments.

Rainer Beurskens, Jason M Wilken, Jonathan B Dingwell

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rainer BeurskensDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Education, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Military Performance Lab, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Jason M WilkenMilitary Performance Lab, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Jonathan B DingwellDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Education, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: jdingwell@austin.utexas.edu.
Brooke Army Medical Center · USTexas Health and Science University · US

Funding

Improving Dynamic Walking Stability in Traumatic AmputeesR01HD059844 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DINGWELL, JONATHAN B · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS 1-R01-HD059844NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interestingly, young and highly active people with lower limb amputation appear to maintain a similar trunk and upper body stability during walking as able-bodied individuals. Understanding the mechanisms underlying how this stability is achieved after lower-leg amputation is important to improve training regimens for improving walking function in these patients. This study quantified how superior (i.e., head, trunk, and pelvis) and inferior (i.e., thigh, shank, and feet) segments of the body respond to continuous visual or mechanical perturbations during walking. Nine persons with transtibial amputation (TTA) and 12 able-bodied controls (AB) walked on a 2 m × 3 m treadmill in a Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN). Subjects were perturbed by continuous pseudo-random mediolateral movements of either the treadmill platform or the visual scene. TTA maintained a similar local and orbital stability in their superior body segments as AB throughout both perturbation types. However, for their inferior body segments, TTA subjects exhibited greater dynamic instability during perturbed walking. In TTA subjects, these increases in instability were even more pronounced in their prosthetic limb compared to their intact leg. These findings demonstrate that persons with unilateral lower leg amputation maintain upper body stability in spite of increased dynamic instability in their impaired lower leg. Thus, transtibial amputation does significantly impair sensorimotor function, leading to substantially altered dynamic movements of their lower limb segments. However, otherwise relatively healthy patients with unilateral transtibial amputation appear to retain sufficient remaining sensorimotor function in their proximal and contralateral limbs to adequately compensate for their impairment.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalEnvironmentPostural BalanceAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansMaleTibiaWalkingYoung AdultAmputationDynamic stabilityGaitPerturbationsWalking

Identifiers

PMID25064425
PMCPMC4163077
OpenAlexW1985564641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.