ArticleNeuropsychologia2014
Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic and environmental contributions to gaze lateralization across social and non-social stimuli in human infants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Visuospatial Bias in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from Line Bisection Tasks.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Infants' anticipatory eye movements: feature-based attention guides infants' visual attention.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Gaze behaviour to lateral face stimuli in infants who do and do not gain an ASD diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Habit2: A stand-alone software solution for presenting stimuli and recording infant looking times in order to study infant development.Behavior research methods · 2019Article
- Facial perception of infants with cleft lip and palate with/without the NAM appliance.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2018Article
- Eye tracking reveals a crucial role for facial motion in recognition of faces by infants.Developmental psychology · 2015Article
- Characterization of performance on an automated visual recognition memory task in 7.5-month-old infants.Neurotoxicology and teratologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A left visual field (LVF) bias has been consistently reported in eye movement patterns when adults look at face stimuli, which reflects hemispheric lateralization of face processing and eye movements. However, the emergence of the LVF attentional bias in infancy is less clear. The present study investigated the emergence and development of the LVF attentional bias in infants from 3 to 9 months of age with moving face stimuli. We specifically examined the naturalness of facial movements in infants'LVF attentional bias by comparing eye movement patterns in naturally and artificially moving faces. Results showed that 3- to 5-month-olds exhibited the LVF attentional bias only in the lower half of naturally moving faces, but not in artificially moving faces. Six- to 9-month-olds showed the LVF attentional bias in both the lower and upper face halves only in naturally moving, but not in artificially moving faces. These results suggest that the LVF attentional bias for face processing may emerge around 3 months of age and is driven by natural facial movements. The LVF attentional bias reflects the role of natural face experience in real life situations that may drive the development of hemispheric lateralization of face processing in infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.