ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2014
Treatment Approaches to Congestion Relief in Acute Decompensated HF: Insights After DOSE-AHF and CARRESS-HF.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regarding the interpretation of creatinine clearance changes following loop diuretics in the intensive care unit.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Usefulness of combining admission brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) plus hospital discharge bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) in predicting 90 days cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute heart failure.Internal and emergency medicine · 2017Observational
- Combined aquaretic and diuretic therapy in acute heart failure.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2017Article
- Loop diuretics in acute heart failure: beyond the decongestive relief for the kidney.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementMost patients admitted to the hospital with ADHF do not achieve adequate relief of signs and symptoms of congestion. Patients with inadequate decongestion are known to be at higher risk of readmission for heart failure and mortality, although it is uncertain whether this is a cause or simply a marker of increased risk. Nonetheless, adequate decongestion is critical for improving quality of life. Based on the DOSE-AHF and CARRESS-HF studies, a high-dose diuretic regimen consisting of 2.5 times the daily dose of loop diuretic in furosemide equivalents, administered in twice-daily bolus doses, is reasonable to achieve a goal of 3-5 liters of urine output per day. Transient increases in creatinine in the first 4-5 days of diuresis should not be a limiting factor, but a prolonged progressive increase in creatinine signals a high-risk patient. Current goals for decongestion should be resolution of orthopnea, jugular venous pressure of < 8 cm of water, and trace to no peripheral edema. The hope is that better measures of assessing complete decongestion will reduce the progression to heart failure and mortality. While the best noninvasive method to assess speed of congestion has not been determined, it is clear that hemoconcentration (an increase in hematocrit) reflects a decrease in plasma volume and decongestion. In-line monitoring of hemoconcentration may improve the results of ultrafiltration therapy by preventing too large and/or too rapid a fall in intravascular volume and consequent triggering of neurohormonal activation. Several additional strategies such as serelaxin, high-dose mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and new forms and combinations of natriuretic peptides have shown promising results in the relief of congestion in patients with ADHF.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.