Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25063519›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014

Are HIV-infected men vulnerable to prostate cancer treatment disparities?

Adam B Murphy, Ramona Bhatia, Iman K Martin, David A Klein, Courtney M P Hollowell, Yaw Nyame, Elodi Dielubanza, Chad Achenbach, Rick A Kittles

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Disparities and Determinants of Cancer Treatment in Elderly Americans Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam B Murphy *Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Ramona Bhatia *Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Iman K MartinNeuropsychiatry Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.
David A KleinFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Courtney M P HollowellDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL.
Yaw NyameGlickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Elodi DielubanzaDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Chad AchenbachDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Rick A KittlesInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Northwestern University · USCleveland Clinic · USCook County Health and Hospitals System · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Latesha Ellen Elopre · 1988 to 2026
$84.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV-infected (HIV(+)) men face cancer treatment disparities that impact outcome. Prostate cancer treatment and treatment appropriateness in HIV(+) men are unknown.

methodsWe used electronic chart review to conduct a retrospective cohort study of 43 HIV(+) cases with prostate cancer and 86 age- and race-matched HIV-uninfected (HIV(-)) controls with prostate cancer, ages 40 to 79 years, from 2001 to 2012. We defined treatment appropriateness using National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) to estimate life expectancy.

resultsMedian age was 59.5 years at prostate cancer diagnosis. Median CD4(+) T-cell count was 459.5 cells/mm(3), 95.3% received antiretroviral therapy, and 87.1% were virally suppressed. Radical prostatectomy was the primary treatment for 39.5% of HIV(+) and 71.0% of HIV(-) men (P = 0.004). Only 16.3% of HIV(+) versus 57.0% of HIV(-) men received open radical prostatectomy (P < 0.001). HIV(+) men received more radiotherapy (25.6% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.13). HIV was negatively associated with open radical prostatectomy (OR = 0.03, P = 0.007), adjusting for insurance and CCI. No men were undertreated. Fewer HIV(+) men received appropriate treatment (89.2% vs. 100%, P = 0.003), due to four overtreated HIV(+) men. Excluding AIDS from the CCI still resulted in fewer HIV(+) men receiving appropriate treatment (94.6% vs. 100%, P = 0.03).

conclusionProstate cancer in HIV(+) men is largely appropriately treated. Under- or overtreatment may occur from difficulties in life expectancy estimation. HIV(+) men may receive more radiotherapy and fewer radical prostatectomies, specifically open radical prostatectomies. IMPACT: Research on HIV/AIDS survival indices and etiologies and outcomes of this prostate cancer treatment disparity in HIV(+) men are needed.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdultAgedCohort StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapyRetrospective StudiesWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID25063519
PMCPMC4184974
OpenAlexW2065980054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.