ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014
In-vivo comparison of the acute retention of stem cell derivatives and fibroblasts after intramyocardial transplantation in the mouse model.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in the clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells for neurological disorders.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- New Approaches in Heart Research: Prevention Instead of Cardiomyoplasty?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Protocol for MicroRNA Transfer into Adult Bone Marrow-derived Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Enable Cell Engineering Combined with Magnetic Targeting.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Recent Progress in Stem Cell Modification for Cardiac Regeneration.Stem cells international · 2018Review
- Non-invasive in vivo imaging of cardiac stem/progenitor cell biodistribution and retention after intracoronary and intramyocardial delivery in a swine model of chronic ischemia reperfusion injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
- PET Cell Tracking UsingScientific reports · 2017Article
- Cell Therapies in Cardiomyopathy: Current Status of Clinical Trials.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2017Review
- Magnet-Bead Based MicroRNA Delivery System to Modify CD133Stem cells international · 2016Article
- In Vivo Tracking of Cell Therapies for Cardiac Diseases with Nuclear Medicine.Stem cells international · 2016Review
- Heart Regeneration with Embryonic Cardiac Progenitor Cells and Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Journal of stem cell and transplantation biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVarious strategies have been applied to increase the engraftment of an intramyocardial cell transplant (Tx) to treat ischemic myocardium. Thereby, co-transplanted fibroblasts (FB) improve the long-term survival of stem cell derivatives (SCD) in a murine model of myocardial infarction. For therapeutic use, the time frame in which FB exert putative supportive effects needs to be identified. Therefore, we tracked the biodistribution and retention of SCD and FB in vivo using highly sensitive positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.
methodsMurine [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) labeled SCD and FB were transplanted after left anterior descending artery (LAD) ligation into the border zone of the ischemic area in female C57BL/6 mice. Cardiac retention and biodistribution during the initial 2 h after injection were measured via PET imaging.
resultsMassive initial cell loss occurred independently of the cell type. Thereby, FB were retained slightly, yet significantly better than SCD until 60 min post-injection (7.5 ± 1.7 vs. 5.2 ± 0.7% ID at 25 min and 7.0 ± 1.5 vs. 4.8 ± 0.8% ID at 60 min). Thereafter, a fraction of ∼ 5% that withstood the massive initial washout remained at the site of injection independently of the applied cell type (120 min, SCD vs. FB P = 0.64). Most of the lost cells were detected in the lungs (∼ 30 % ID).
conclusionsWe were able to quantitatively define the retention and biodistribution of different cell types via PET imaging in a mouse model after intramyocardial Tx. The utmost accuracy was achieved through this cell- and organ-specific approach by correcting PET data for cellular FDG efflux. Thereby, we observed a massive initial cell loss of ∼ 95%, causing low rates of long-term engraftment for both SCD and FB. We conclude that FB are not privileged compared to SCD regarding their acute retention kinetics, and therefore exert their beneficial effects at a later time point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.