ArticlePituitary2015
Giant prolactinomas: clinical manifestations and outcomes of 16 Arab cases.
Article in Pituitary, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2022Article
- Clinical Features, Therapeutic Trends, and Outcome of Giant Prolactinomas: A Single-Center Experience Over a 12-Year Period.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2020Article
- Beat the giant: case of a giant prolactinoma during pregnancy on cabergoline.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2018Article
- Long-term outcome of multimodal therapy for giant prolactinomas.Endocrine · 2017Article
- Article
- Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Invasive Giant Prolactinomas after a Mean Ten-Year Followup.International journal of endocrinology · 2016Article
- Ten-year follow-up of a giant prolactinoma.BMJ case reports · 2015Article
- Case Report: Persistent erectile dysfunction in a man with prolactinoma.F1000Research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of giant prolactinomas remains a major challenge, despite dopamine agonists being the first line of treatment, owing to its efficacy to normalize prolactin levels and reduce tumor volume. The aim of this study is to characterize the therapeutic aspects, manifestations and outcomes of 16 cases of giant prolactinomas admitted at a single tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
methodsRetrospective data collection involving 16 Saudi patients diagnosed with giant prolactinoma at the Pituitary Clinic in King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between January 2006 and July 2012.
resultsA total of 16 patients (ten males; six females) with age of diagnosis between 21 and 55 years (mean 34.9 years) were included in the analysis. The most common presenting features include headache, visual defects and sexual dysfunction. Baseline mean serum prolactin level were extremely high for both sexes which eventually decreased by as much as 97% after cabergoline treatment. Serum prolactin concentrations completely normalized in six patients and significantly decreased in five patients 3-5 times that of normal range. Tumor volume also decreased by an average of 86% for males and 87% for females. Two patients had no tumor size change with cabergoline and required surgery.
conclusionFindings indicate that cabergoline provides dramatic clinical improvements with excellent safety profile. Cabergoline should therefore be considered as the primary therapy for giant prolactinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.