ArticleSurgery today2015
In-vivo trachea regeneration: fabrication of a tissue-engineered trachea in nude mice using the body as a natural bioreactor.
Article in Surgery today, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regeneration Process of an Autologous Tissue-Engineered Trachea (aTET) in a Rat Patch Tracheoplasty Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Synergistic Effects of SDS and HInternational journal of biomaterials · 2024Article
- Bioengineering and Clinical Translation of Human Lung and its Components.Advanced biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Extracellular Matrix Scaffold Using Decellularized Cartilage for Hyaline Cartilage Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology-The state of translation.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020Review
- The Challenge in Using Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Recellularization of Decellularized Cartilage.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2017Review
- A novel technique for simultaneous whole-body and multi-organ decellularization: umbilical artery catheterization as a perfusion-based method in a sheep foetus model.International journal of experimental pathology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the outcomes of implanting rat decellularized trachea scaffold (DTS) between the paravertebral muscles of nude mice using the body as a bioreactor for total graft recellularization.
methodsThe tracheas of four rats were aseptically resected and decellularized. To assess the efficiency of the decellularization procedure, all decellularized scaffolds and native control tissues were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), DAPI staining, DNA quantification, biomechanical analyses and hydroxyproline measurement. They were then implanted between the paravertebral muscles of four nude mice. The biopsies were precisely evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively for tracheal cartilage and soft tissue recellularization by staining for TTF1, CD34, S100 and leukocyte common antibody.
resultsHematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, SEM and the tensile test confirmed the preservation of the tissue structure and the biophysical and biochemical properties of the DTS. The present study clearly demonstrated that the hydroxyproline content of the DTS was similar to that of the native tissue. On the other hand, in biopsy samples obtained after 12 months, histological evaluation showed superior organization and cell seeding in both the cartilage and connective tissues.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the feasibility of using a natural bioreactor for recellularizing DTS; this may have the potential to facilitate homologous transplantation for repairing segmental trachea defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.