Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2014
Family-focused treatment for adolescents and young adults at high risk for psychosis: results of a randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prevention Trial of Family Focused Treatment in Youth at Risk for Psychosis
Family-Focused Therapy for Individuals at High Clinical Risk for Psychosis: A Confirmatory Efficacy Trial
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early interventions for first onset of symptoms of mental health conditions: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Preventing psychosis in people at clinical high risk: an updated meta-analysis by the World Psychiatric Association Preventive Psychiatry section.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Review: Efficacy of preventative interventions for children and adolescents at clinical high risk of psychosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies.Child and adolescent mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Negative symptoms in children and adolescents with early-onset psychosis and at clinical high-risk for psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2023Pooled it
- Attrition rates in trials for adolescents and young adults at clinical high-risk for psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Psychological interventions in psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Attenuated psychotic symptom interventions in youth at risk of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Preventive Treatments for Psychosis: Umbrella Review (Just the Evidence).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Negative Symptom Interventions in Youth at Risk of Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of a Multifamily App-Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Delivered via Telehealth for Parents of Adolescents With Mood or Psychotic Spectrum Disorders.Behavior therapy · 2025Trial
- Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status as predictors of outcome following family therapy in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Family communication and the efficacy of family focused therapy in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis with comorbid anxiety.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Baseline data of a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (STEP study).Early intervention in psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Family-focused therapy for individuals at high clinical risk for psychosis: A confirmatory efficacy trial.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Effects of High- versus Low-Intensity Clinician Training on Implementation of Family-Focused Therapy for Youth with Mood and Psychotic Disorders.Family process · 2021Trial
- Computer-aided learning for managing stress: A feasibility trial with clinical high risk adolescents and young adults.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Depression, family interaction and family intervention in adolescents at clinical-high risk for psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2021Trial
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLongitudinal studies have begun to clarify the phenotypic characteristics of adolescents and young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis. This 8-site randomized trial examined whether a 6-month program of family psychoeducation was effective in reducing the severity of attenuated positive and negative psychotic symptoms and enhancing functioning among individuals at high risk.
methodAdolescents and young adults (mean age 17.4 ± 4.1 years) with attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, brief and intermittent psychosis, or genetic risk with functional deterioration were randomly assigned to 18 sessions of family-focused therapy for individuals at clinical high risk (FFT-CHR) in 6 months or 3 sessions of family psychoeducation (enhanced care [EC]). FFT-CHR included psychoeducation about early signs of psychosis, stress management, communication training, and problem-solving skills training, whereas EC focused on symptom prevention. Independent evaluators assessed participants at baseline and 6 months on positive and negative symptoms and social-role functioning.
resultsOf 129 participants, 102 (79.1%) were followed up at 6 months. Participants in FFT-CHR showed greater improvements in attenuated positive symptoms over 6 months than participants in EC (F1,97 = 5.49, p = .02). Negative symptoms improved independently of psychosocial treatments. Changes in psychosocial functioning depended on age: participants more than 19 years of age showed more role improvement in FFT-CHR, whereas participants between 16 and 19 years of age showed more role improvement in EC. The results were independent of concurrent pharmacotherapy.
conclusionInterventions that focus on improving family relationships may have prophylactic efficacy in individuals at high risk for psychosis. Future studies should examine the specificity of effects of family intervention compared to individual therapy of the same duration and frequency. Clinical trial registration information-Prevention Trial of Family Focused Treatment in Youth at Risk for Psychosis; http://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT01907282.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.