Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25062503›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2014

Complex regulation of dendritic transmitter release from thalamic interneurons.

Charles L Cox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Retinal and Nonretinal Contributions to Extraclassical Surround Suppression in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dendritic Release of Neurotransmitters.Comprehensive Physiology · 2016
    Review
  6. Effects of Optogenetic Activation of Corticothalamic Terminals in the Motor Thalamus of Awake Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  7. Visual Functions of the Thalamus.Annual review of vision science · 2015
    Article
  8. Multiple signalling modalities mediated by dendritic exocytosis of oxytocin and vasopressin.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles L CoxDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States. Electronic address: coxclee@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Modulation of Subcortical Visual Information ProcessingR01EY014024 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI COX, CHARLES LEROY · 2003 to 2012
$2.6M
Synaptic Phenotype, Development, and Plasticity in the Fragile X MouseR01MH085324 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI COX, CHARLES LEROY · 2010 to 2015
$2.1M
Modulation of Subcortical Visual Information ProcessingR56EY014024 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI COX, CHARLES LEROY · 2009 to 2009
$384k
NEI NIH HHS EY014024NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014024NEI NIH HHS R56 EY014024NIMH NIH HHS MH08532NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal output typically involves neurotransmitter release via axonal terminals; however, a subpopulation of neurons can also release neurotransmitters through vesicle-containing presynaptic dendrites. In the thalamus, local circuit inhibitory interneurons are a class of cells that can release γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) via both axon terminals (termed F1 terminals) as well as presynaptic, vesicle-containing dendrites (termed F2 terminals). For example, in the visual thalamus, these F2 terminals are tightly coupled to the primary sensory afferents (axons of retinogeniculate neurons) that synapse onto thalamocortical relay neurons. The F2 terminals are primarily localized to distal dendrites of the interneurons, and in certain situations the excitation/output of F2 terminals can occur independent of somatic activity within the interneuron thereby allowing these F2 terminals to serve as independent input/output components giving rise to focal inhibition. On the other hand, somatically evoked Na+-dependent action potentials can backpropagate throughout the dendritic arbor of the interneuron. The transient depolarizations, or stronger somatically initiated events (e.g. activation of low threshold calcium transients) can initiate a backpropagating Ca(2+)-mediated potential that invades the dendritic arbor activating F2 terminals and leading to a global form of inhibition. These distinct types of output (focal versus global) could play an important role in the temporal as well as spatial roles of inhibition that in turn impacts thalamocortical information processing.

Indexed as

AnimalsDendritesInterneuronsNeural InhibitionNeurotransmitter AgentsThalamusNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID25062503
PMCPMC5149401
OpenAlexW2021492644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.