Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25061757›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Improving the safety of Staphylococcus aureus polyvalent phages by their production on a Staphylococcus xylosus strain.

Lynn El Haddad, Nour Ben Abdallah, Pier-Luc Plante, Jeannot Dumaresq, Ramaz Katsarava, Steve Labrie, Jacques Corbeil, Daniel St-Gelais, Sylvain Moineau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. mBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phage Therapy againstPharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification, Characterization, and Genomic Analysis of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Phage S144, A New Polyvalent Phage InfectingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. BioprospectingViruses · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lynn El HaddadDépartement de biochimie et de microbiologie, Faculté des sciences et de génie, Groupe de recherche en écologie buccale, Faculté de médecine dentaire, Félix d'Hérelle Reference Center for Bacterial Viruses, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Nour Ben AbdallahFood Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada.
Pier-Luc PlanteDépartement de Médecine Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Jeannot DumaresqDépartement de Microbiologie et d'Infectiologie, Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Lévis, Québec, Canada.
Ramaz KatsaravaInstitute of Chemistry & Molecular Engineering, Agricultural University of Georgia, University Campus at Digomi, Tbilsi, Georgia.
Steve LabrieDépartement des sciences des aliments et de nutrition, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, Dairy Science and Technology Research Centre/Institute of nutrition and functional foods, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Jacques CorbeilDépartement de Médecine Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Daniel St-GelaisFood Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada; Département des sciences des aliments et de nutrition, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, Dairy Science and Technology Research Centre/Institute of nutrition and functional foods, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Sylvain MoineauDépartement de biochimie et de microbiologie, Faculté des sciences et de génie, Groupe de recherche en écologie buccale, Faculté de médecine dentaire, Félix d'Hérelle Reference Center for Bacterial Viruses, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Team1 (vB_SauM_Team1) is a polyvalent staphylococcal phage belonging to the Myoviridae family. Phage Team1 was propagated on a Staphylococcus aureus strain and a non-pathogenic Staphylococcus xylosus strain used in industrial meat fermentation. The two Team1 preparations were compared with respect to their microbiological and genomic properties. The burst sizes, latent periods, and host ranges of the two derivatives were identical as were their genome sequences. Phage Team1 has 140,903 bp of double stranded DNA encoding for 217 open reading frames and 4 tRNAs. Comparative genomic analysis revealed similarities to staphylococcal phages ISP (97%) and G1 (97%). The host range of Team1 was compared to the well-known polyvalent staphylococcal phages phi812 and K using a panel of 57 S. aureus strains collected from various sources. These bacterial strains were found to represent 18 sequence types (MLST) and 14 clonal complexes (eBURST). Altogether, the three phages propagated on S. xylosus lysed 52 out of 57 distinct strains of S. aureus. The identification of phage-insensitive strains underlines the importance of designing phage cocktails with broadly varying and overlapping host ranges. Taken altogether, our study suggests that some staphylococcal phages can be propagated on food-grade bacteria for biocontrol and safety purposes.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralFermentationFood HandlingHumansMeatStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus Phages

Identifiers

PMID25061757
PMCPMC4111496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.