Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25061606›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Correlates of smoke-free home policies in Shanghai, China.

Pinpin Zheng, Michelle C Kegler, Carla J Berg, Wenjie Fu, Jing Wang, Xilan Zhou, Dong Liu, Hua Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Factors Associated with Complete Home Smoking Ban among Chinese Parents of Young Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Smoke-free homes and home exposure to secondhand smoke in Shanghai, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pinpin ZhengKey Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yixueyuan Road, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3902-2955
Michelle C KeglerRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Carla J BergRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Wenjie FuKey Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yixueyuan Road, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6889-3413
Jing WangCenter of Disease Control, Pudong District, Shanghai 200136, China.
Xilan ZhouCenter of Disease Control, Pudong District, Shanghai 200136, China.
Dong LiuCenter of Disease Control, Fengxian District, Shanghai 201400, China.
Hua FuKey Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yixueyuan Road, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8649-1899

Funding

Brief Interventions to Create Smoke-Free Home Policies in Low-Income HousehouldsU01CA154282 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KEGLER, MICHELLE C · 2011 to 2015
$6.2M
Development of a Tailored eHealth Smoking Intervention for Community CollegesK07CA139114 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, CARLA J · 2010 to 2014
$640k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA139114NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154282NCI NIH HHS U01CA154282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 63.7% of nonsmokers in China are exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) in their homes. The current study documents the prevalence and correlates of smoke-free home policies in Shanghai, as well as reasons for implementing such a policy and places where smoking is most commonly allowed.

methodsWe conducted in-person surveys of 500 participants using a multistage proportional random sampling design in an urban and suburban district.

resultsOverall, 35.3% had a smoke-free home policy. In the logistic regression, having higher income, not having smokers in the home, having children in the home, having fewer friends/relatives who permit smoking at home, and not being a current smoker were correlates of having a smoke-free home policy (P < 0.05). Concern about the health impact of SHS was reportedly the most important reason for establishing a smoke-free home. Among participants with no or partial bans, the most common places where smoking was allowed included the living room (64.2%), kitchen (46.1%), and bathroom (33.8%).

conclusionsSmoke-free home policies were in place for a minority of households surveyed. Establishing such a policy was influenced by personal smoking behavior and social factors. These findings suggest an urgent need to promote smoke-free home policies through tobacco control programs.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicySmokingUrban RenewalChinaFemaleHumansMalePublic HousingSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID25061606
PMCPMC4100358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.