Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25061233›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of public health2015

A stepped wedge cluster randomized control trial of dried blood spot testing to improve the uptake of hepatitis C antibody testing within UK prisons.

Noel Craine, Rhiannon Whitaker, Stephanie Perrett, Lu Zou, Matthew Hickman, Marion Lyons

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Persons in correctional facilities in Canada: A key population for hepatitis C prevention and control.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noel Craine1 Microbiology Department, Public Health Wales, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor, Wales, UK noel.craine@wales.nhs.uk.
Rhiannon Whitaker2 North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health and Social Care, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales, UK.
Stephanie Perrett3 Health Protection, Public health Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Lu Zou2 North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health and Social Care, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales, UK.
Matthew Hickman4 School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, England, UK.
Marion Lyons3 Health Protection, Public health Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) is elevated within prison populations, yet diagnosis in prisons remains low. Dried blood spot testing (DBST) is a simple procedure for the detection of HCV antibodies; its impact on testing in the prison context is unknown.

methodsWe carried out a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized control trial of DBST for HCV among prisoners within five male prisons and one female prison. Each prison was a separate cluster. The order in which the intervention (training in use of DBST for HCV testing and logistic support) was introduced was randomized across clusters. The outcome measure was the HCV testing rate by prison. Imputation analysis was carried out to account for missing data. Planned and actual intervention times differed in some prisons; data were thus analysed by intention to treat (ITT) and by observed step times.

resultsThere was insufficient evidence of an effect of the intervention on testing rate using either the ITT intervention time (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.68-1.03; P = 0.088) or using the actual intervention time (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.71-1.06; P = 0.153). This was confirmed by the pooled results of five imputed data sets.

conclusionsDBST as a stand-alone intervention was insufficient to increase HCV diagnosis within the UK prison setting. Factors such as staff training and allocation of staff time for regular clinics are key to improving service delivery. We demonstrate that prisons can conduct rigorous studies of new interventions, but data collection can be problematic.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN number ISRCTN05628482).

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisDried Blood Spot TestingFemaleHepatitis CHepatitis C AntibodiesHumansMalePrisonersReproducibility of ResultsUnited KingdomHepatitis C Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID25061233
PMCPMC4376964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.