Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25060980›Full record

ReviewDrugs2014

Macitentan: a review of its use in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Sohita Dhillon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sohita DhillonSpringer, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, 0754, Auckland, New Zealand, demail@springer.com.
Springer Nature (New Zealand) · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macitentan (Opsumit(®)) is an orally active, dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) with tissue targeting properties. Macitentan was approved recently in the EU (as monotherapy or combination therapy) for the long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in adults of WHO functional class II or III, and in the USA for the treatment of PAH (WHO group I) to delay disease progression and reduce hospitalization for PAH. This article reviews the pharmacological properties, efficacy and tolerability data relevant to the use of macitentan in this indication. Treatment with macitentan 10 mg once daily significantly reduced the risk for the primary composite endpoint of morbidity and mortality in patients with PAH (mostly WHO functional class II or III) in the large, randomized, placebo-controlled SERAPHIN study. Other efficacy outcomes, including exercise capacity, haemodynamic parameters and health-related quality of life also improved significantly with macitentan relative to placebo. Macitentan was generally well tolerated in this study. As with other ERAs, haemoglobin levels decreased with macitentan therapy; however, these were not progressive and stabilized following longer-term treatment. Although comparative studies are needed to definitively position macitentan with respect to other approved agents, current evidence suggests that macitentan is a useful treatment option for initial therapy in patients with WHO functional class II or III PAH, which has the potential advantage of once-daily administration.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsDisease ProgressionEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsHospitalizationHumansHypertension, PulmonaryPyrimidinesQuality of LifeSulfonamidesTime FactorsEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsmacitentanPyrimidinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID25060980
OpenAlexW1988922845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.