Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25060959›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2015

The contribution of conceptual frameworks to knowledge translation interventions in physical therapy.

Anne Hudon, Mathieu-Joël Gervais, Matthew Hunt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A conceptual framework for the public health monitoring of substance-related harms.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne HudonA. Hudon, PT, MSc, PhD candidate in Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Mailing address: École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7 Canada. anne.hudon@umontreal.ca.
Mathieu-Joël GervaisM-J. Gervais, PhD candidate, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, CJM-IU-UQÀM Chair on Knowledge Translation in the Field of Child and Family Welfare.
Matthew HuntM. Hunt, PT, PhD, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, and Assistant Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing recognition of the importance of knowledge translation activities in physical therapy to ensure that research findings are integrated into clinical practice, and increasing numbers of knowledge translation interventions are being conducted. Although various frameworks have been developed to guide and facilitate the process of translating knowledge into practice, these tools have been infrequently used in physical therapy knowledge translation studies to date. Knowledge translation in physical therapy implicates multiple stakeholders and environments and involves numerous steps. In light of this complexity, the use of explicit conceptual frameworks by clinicians and researchers conducting knowledge translation interventions is associated with a range of potential benefits. This perspective article argues that such frameworks are important resources to promote the uptake of new evidence in physical therapist practice settings. Four key benefits associated with the use of conceptual frameworks in designing and implementing knowledge translation interventions are identified, and limits related to their use are considered. A sample of 5 conceptual frameworks is evaluated, and how they address common barriers to knowledge translation in physical therapy is assessed. The goal of this analysis is to provide guidance to physical therapists seeking to identify a framework to support the design and implementation of a knowledge translation intervention. Finally, the use of a conceptual framework is illustrated through a case example. Increased use of conceptual frameworks can have a positive impact on the field of knowledge translation in physical therapy and support the development and implementation of robust and effective knowledge translation interventions that help span the research-practice gap.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy SpecialtyDiffusion of InnovationHumansOrganizational Case StudiesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhysical Therapy ModalitiesTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID25060959
PMCPMC4384052
OpenAlexW2161263927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.