ArticleMaternal and child health journal2015
International comparison of common risk factors of preterm birth between the U.S. and Canada, using PRAMS and MES (2005-2006).
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between adverse birth outcomes and smoking cessation during pregnancy across the United States-43 States and New York City, 2012-2017.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Term Neonates.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Preterm birth disparities between states in the United States: an opportunity for public health interventions.Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020Article
- Variations in very preterm birth rates in 30 high-income countries: are valid international comparisons possible using routine data?BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2017Article
- Relationship Between Common Mental Disorder Symptoms During Pregnancy and Preterm Birth Among Chinese Women in Wuhan.Maternal and child health journal · 2016Article
- Review
- A proposed bio-panel to predict risk for spontaneous preterm birth among African American women.Medical hypotheses · 2015Article
- What contributes to disparities in the preterm birth rate in European countries?Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2015Review
- Perinatal outcomes of maternal overweight and obesity in term infants: a population-based cohort study in Canada.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Symptoms of Depression and Preterm Birth Among Black Women.MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursingArticle
- Patient's experience with the Arabin cervical pessary during pregnancy: A questionnaire survey.PloS oneArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Preterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of newborn deaths and morbidities. The pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS) from the U.S., and the maternity experiences survey (MES) from Canada, which was modeled from PRAMS, were used to examine between-country differences in risk factors of preterm birth. The adjusted risk ratio and population attributable fraction (PAF) were calculated for modifiable and semi-modifiable risk factors of PTB, and all measures were compared between the U.S. and Canada. PTB was defined here as a live singleton birth between 28 and 37 completed weeks gestation (using the clinical gestational age estimate) where the baby was living with the mother at the time of the survey. The PTB risk was 7.6 % (SE = 0.2) in the U.S. and 4.9 % (SE = 0.3) in Canada. The a priori high risk category of factors was almost always more prevalent in the U.S. than Canada, suggesting broad social differences, but individually most of these differences were not associated with PTB. The underlying risk of PTB was generally higher in the U.S. in both the higher risk and referent categories, and the risk ratios for most risk factors were similar between the countries. The primary exception was for recurrence of PTB, where the risk ratio (RR) and PAF were much higher in Canada. We observed between-country differences in both the prevalence of risk factors and the adjusted RR. Further between-country comparisons may lead to important inferences as to the influence of modifiable risk factors contributing to PTB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.