Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25060686›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2015

Which should be the gold standard laparoscopic technique for handling Spigelian hernias?

Alfredo Moreno-Egea, Álvaro Campillo-Soto, German Morales-Cuenca

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spigelian hernia: current approach to surgical treatment-peculiarities in this rare condition.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  14. Spigelian hernia: current approaches to surgical treatment-a review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alfredo Moreno-EgeaAbdominal Wall Unit, Department of Surgery, Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Avda Primo de Rivera 7, 5ºD, 3008, Murcia, Spain, morenoegeaalfredo@gmail.com.
Álvaro Campillo-Soto
German Morales-Cuenca
Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advantages and disadvantages of both extraperitoneal and intra-abdominal laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repair are still being discussed. To our knowledge, no study has compared both techniques in terms of safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness.

methodProspective data were collected to compare the results of the extraperitoneal approach with the intra-abdominal approach in laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repair, between 2000 and 2012 (n = 16). Diagnosis was confirmed preoperatively by ultrasonography and/or tomography.

resultsSpigelian hernias occur mostly in women (69 %), on the left side (56 %) and at a median age of 62 (range: 38-83). In our study, the extraperitoneal technique was performed in seven patients, while the intra-abdominal approach was indicated in nine. No complications, re-admissions, or recurrences were detected in either during a mean follow-up of 48 months (range: 18 months-9 years). The statistical study showed that there was no difference in either morbidity or the recurrence rate between a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and an intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair. The mean duration of an IPOM repair was, though, shorter than that of a TEP repair (30 vs. 48 min, P = 0.06). The combined fixation technique (tacks + glue) did not modify the results but did reduce the costs, as shown in the cost-effectiveness study where the intra-abdominal approach was cheaper (1260 vs. 2200 euros, P < 0.001).

conclusionLaparoscopy seems to be a safe and feasible technique whichever the approach chosen, be it intra or extraperitoneal. Our experience shows that intra-abdominal laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repair should be recommended as the gold standard because of its technical and economic advantages. The IPOM procedure with a lightweight titanium-coated mesh fixed using a combined technique is a highly effective option for Spigelian hernia repair.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceSpain

Identifiers

PMID25060686
OpenAlexW2096874121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.