ArticleParasites & vectors2014
Contemporary gene flow between wild An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybridization and introgression of the mitochondrial genome between the two speciesParasitology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the cost of malaria elimination by Anopheles gambiae precision guided SIT in the Upper River region, The Gambia.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- The potential of gene drives in malaria vector species to control malaria in African environments.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysis of geometric morphometrics and molecular phylogeny for Anopheles species in the Republic of Korea.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Analysis of the Genetic Variation of theInsects · 2022Article
- East Africa International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research: Summary of Key Research Findings.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022Article
- Article
- Impact of seasonality and malaria control interventions on Anopheles density and species composition from three areas of Uganda with differing malaria endemicity.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- Monitoring Needs for Gene Drive Mosquito Projects: Lessons From Vector Control Field Trials and Invasive Species.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Unveiling mosquito cryptic species and their reproductive isolation.Insect molecular biology · 2020Review
- Introgression of a synthetic sex ratio distortion system from Anopheles gambiae into Anopheles arabiensis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Coalescent Analysis of Phylogenomic Data Confidently Resolves the Species Relationships in the Anopheles gambiae Species Complex.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Emerging Pyrethroid Resistance amongThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018Article
- Article
- Tracing the origin of the early wet-seasonEvolutionary applications · 2017Article
- Genome-Wide Divergence in the West-African Malaria Vector Anopheles melas.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Powerful methods for detecting introgressed regions from population genomic data.Molecular ecology · 2016Article
- The potential for adaptive maintenance of diversity in insect antimicrobial peptides.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Review
- How reticulated are species?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn areas where the morphologically indistinguishable malaria mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae Giles and An. arabiensis Patton are sympatric, hybrids are detected occasionally via species-diagnostic molecular assays. An. gambiae and An. arabiensis exhibit both pre- and post-reproductive mating barriers, with swarms largely species-specific and male F1 (first-generation) hybrids sterile. Consequently advanced-stage hybrids (back-crosses to parental species), which would represent a route for potentially-adaptive introgression, are expected to be very rare in natural populations. Yet the use of one or two physically linked single-locus diagnostic assays renders them indistinguishable from F1 hybrids and levels of interspecific gene flow are unknown.
methodsWe used data from over 350 polymorphic autosomal SNPs to investigate post F1 gene flow via patterns of genomic admixture between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis from eastern Uganda. Simulations were used to investigate the statistical power to detect hybrids with different levels of crossing and to identify the hybrid category significantly admixed genotypes could represent.
resultsA range of admixture proportions were detected for 11 field-collected hybrids identified via single-locus species-diagnostic PCRs. Comparison of admixture data with simulations indicated that at least seven of these hybrids were advanced generation crosses, with backcrosses to each species identified. In addition, of 36 individuals typing as An. gambiae or An. arabiensis that exhibited outlying admixture proportions, ten were identified as significantly mixed backcrosses, and at least four of these were second or third generation crosses.
conclusionsOur results show that hybrids detected using standard diagnostics will often be hybrid generations beyond F1, and that in our study area around 5% (95% confidence intervals 3%-9%) of apparently 'pure' species samples may also be backcrosses. This is likely an underestimate because of rapidly-declining detection power beyond the first two backcross generations. Post-F1 gene flow occurs at a far from inconsequential rate between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and, especially for traits under strong selection, could readily lead to adaptive introgression of genetic variants relevant for vector control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.