Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25060101›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Shared genetic pathways contribute to the tolerance of endogenous and low-dose exogenous DNA damage in yeast.

Kevin Lehner, Sue Jinks-Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The function of Mgs1/WRNIP1 in genome maintenance.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin LehnerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Sue Jinks-RobertsonDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 sue.robertson@duke.edu.

Funding

Genetics Training Grant-Year 26T32GM007754 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAASE, STEVEN B · 1985 to 2019
$8.3M
REGULATION OF MITOTIC RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM038464 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1992 to 2015
$3.6M
Tolerance of spontaneous and induced DNA damage in yeastR01GM064769 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 2002 to 2010
$1.9M
RECOMBINATION BETWEEN REPEATED SEQUENCE IN YEASTR29GM038464 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1987 to 1991
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM038464NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038464NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064769NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage that escapes repair and blocks replicative DNA polymerases is tolerated by bypass mechanisms that fall into two general categories: error-free template switching and error-prone translesion synthesis. Prior studies of DNA damage responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have demonstrated that repair mechanisms are critical for survival when a single, high dose of DNA damage is delivered, while bypass/tolerance mechanisms are more important for survival when the damage level is low and continuous (acute and chronic damage, respectively). In the current study, epistatic interactions between DNA-damage tolerance genes were examined and compared when haploid yeast cells were exposed to either chronic ultraviolet light or chronic methyl methanesulfonate. Results demonstrate that genes assigned to error-free and error-prone bypass pathways similarly promote survival in the presence of each type of chronic damage. In addition to using defined sources of chronic damage, rates of spontaneous mutations generated by the Pol ζ translesion synthesis DNA polymerase (complex insertions in a frameshift-reversion assay) were used to infer epistatic interactions between the same genes. Similar epistatic interactions were observed in analyses of spontaneous mutation rates, suggesting that chronic DNA-damage responses accurately reflect those used to tolerate spontaneous lesions. These results have important implications when considering what constitutes a safe and acceptable level of exogenous DNA damage.

Indexed as

DNA DamageBase SequenceDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA HelicasesEpistasis, GeneticGenes, FungalMolecular Sequence DataRecombinational DNA RepairSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA HelicasesDNA polymerase zetaMMS2 protein, S cerevisiaeMPH1 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD18 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD5 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesDNA damagelesion bypasstemplate switchtranslesion synthesisyeast

Identifiers

PMID25060101
PMCPMC4196610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.