Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25059979›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2014

Health benefits of serious involvement in leisure activities among older Korean adults.

Junhyoung Kim, Naoko Yamada, Jinmoo Heo, Areum Han

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. "Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junhyoung KimDepartment of Recreation, Parks, and Leisure Services Administration, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI, USA.
Naoko YamadaDivision of Sport Science, Pusan National University, Pusan, South Korea.
Jinmoo HeoDepartment of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Areum HanDepartment of Recreation, Parks, and Leisure Services Administration, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI, USA; aruemee@naver.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing literature suggests that serious engagement in leisure activities leads to happiness, life satisfaction, and successful aging among older adults. This qualitative study was used to examine the benefits of serious involvement in leisure activities among older Korean adults who were members of a sports club. Using an analytic data analysis, we identified three main themes associated with the benefits of serious engagement in leisure activities: 1) the experience of psychological benefits, 2) the creation of social support, and 3) the enhancement of physical health. These themes indicate that, through serious involvement in certain physical activities, participants gain various health benefits, which may contribute to successful aging.

Indexed as

ExerciseLeisure ActivitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHealth StatusHumansMalePersonal SatisfactionQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeRepublic of KoreaSocial Supporthealtholder Korean adultsSerious leisurewell-being

Identifiers

PMID25059979
PMCPMC4110381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.