ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2014
Specialists and generalists: the sexual ecology of the genome.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autosomally-encoded segregation distortion of sex chromosomes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Mating preferences of selfish sex chromosomes.Nature · 2019Article
- Paternally Expressed Imprinted Genes under Positive Darwinian Selection in Arabidopsis thaliana.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
- Time from pre-eclampsia diagnosis to delivery affects future health prospects of children.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2017Article
- Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Genomic conflicts and sexual antagonism in human health: insights from oxytocin and testosterone.Evolutionary applications · 2015Review
- Sexual conflict between parents: offspring desertion and asymmetrical parental care.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014Review
- The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014Review
- A Paradox of Genetic Variance in Epigamic Traits: Beyond "Good Genes" View of Sexual Selection.Evolutionary biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual antagonism occurs when an allele is beneficial in one sex but costly in the other. Parental antagonism occurs when an allele is beneficial when inherited from one sex but costly when inherited from the other because of fitness interactions among kin. Sexual and parental antagonisms together define four genetic niches within the genome that favor different patterns of gene expression. Natural selection generates linkage disequilibrium among sexually and parentally antagonistic loci with male-beneficial alleles coupled to alleles that are beneficial when inherited from males and female-beneficial alleles coupled to alleles that are beneficial when inherited from females. Linkage disequilibrium also develops between sexually and parentally antagonistic loci and loci that influence sex determination. Genes evolve sex-specific expression to resolve sexual antagonism and evolve imprinted expression to resolve parental antagonism. Sex-specific chromosomes allow a gene to specialize in a single niche.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.