Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25059451›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2014

Local control after fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases.

Selvan Rajakesari, Nils D Arvold, Rachel B Jimenez, Laura W Christianson, Margaret C Horvath, Elizabeth B Claus, Alexandra J Golby, Mark D Johnson, Ian F Dunn, Eudocia Q Lee and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03726359 (Phase I TITE-CREM Dose Escalation Study of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03726359 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Phase I TITE-CREM Dose Escalation Study of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (FSRT) in Unresected Brain Metastases

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2017 to 2027Enrolled43ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmsFractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (FSRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CyberknifeJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Expanding Role of Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Selvan RajakesariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nils D Arvold
Rachel B Jimenez
Laura W Christianson
Margaret C Horvath
Elizabeth B Claus
Alexandra J Golby
Mark D Johnson
Ian F Dunn
Eudocia Q Lee
Nancy U Lin
Scott Friesen
Edward G Mannarino
Matthew Wagar
Fred L Hacker
Stephanie E Weiss
Brian M Alexander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is frequently used in the management of brain metastases, but concerns over potential toxicity limit applications for larger lesions or those in eloquent areas. Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is often substituted for SRS in these cases. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of patients who received SRT at our institution. Seventy patients with brain metastases treated with SRT from 2006-2012 were analyzed. The rates of local and distant intracranial progression, overall survival, acute toxicity, and radionecrosis were determined. The SRT regimen was 25 Gy in 5 fractions among 87 % of patients. The most common tumor histologies were non-small cell lung cancer (37 %), breast cancer (20 %) and melanoma (20 %), and the median tumor diameter was 1.7 cm (range 0.4-6.4 cm). Median survival after SRT was 10.7 months. Median time to local progression was 17 months, with a local control rate of 68 % at 6 months and 56 % at 1 year. Acute toxicity was seen in 11 patients (16 %), mostly grade 1 or 2 with the most common symptom being mild headache. Symptomatic radiation-induced treatment change was seen on follow-up MRIs in three patients (4.3 %). SRT appears to be a safe and reasonably effective technique to treat brain metastases deemed less suitable for SRS, though dose intensification strategies may further improve local control.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.