Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25059282›Full record

ArticleMolecular pain2014

Exploring pharmacological activities and signaling of morphinans substituted in position 6 as potent agonists interacting with the μ opioid receptor.

Tanila Ben Haddou, Davide Malfacini, Girolamo Calo, Mario D Aceto, Louis S Harris, John R Traynor, Andrew Coop, Helmut Schmidhammer, Mariana Spetea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: ComparativeACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Opioids and Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Literature Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tanila Ben Haddou
Davide Malfacini
Girolamo Calo
Mario D Aceto
Louis S Harris
John R Traynor
Andrew Coop
Helmut Schmidhammer
Mariana SpeteaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmacy and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, Innsbruck A-6020, Austria. Mariana.Spetea@uibk.ac.at.
Universität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Ferrara · ITVirginia Commonwealth University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Cellular Mechanisms in Animal Models of DepressionR01MH083754 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 2011 to 2011
$386k
Austrian Science Fund FWF TRP 19NIDA NIH HHS N01DA-1-7725NIMH NIH HHS MH083754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid analgesics are the most effective drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. However, they also produce several adverse effects that can complicate pain management. The μ opioid (MOP) receptor, a G protein-coupled receptor, is recognized as the opioid receptor type which primarily mediates the pharmacological actions of clinically used opioid agonists. The morphinan class of analgesics including morphine and oxycodone are of main importance as therapeutically valuable drugs. Though the natural alkaloid morphine contains a C-6-hydroxyl group and the semisynthetic derivative oxycodone has a 6-carbonyl function, chemical approaches have uncovered that functionalizing position 6 gives rise to a range of diverse activities. Hence, position 6 of N-methylmorphinans is one of the most manipulated sites, and is established to play a key role in ligand binding at the MOP receptor, efficacy, signaling, and analgesic potency. We have earlier reported on a chemically innovative modification in oxycodone resulting in novel morphinans with 6-acrylonitrile incorporated substructures.

resultsThis study describes in vitro and in vivo pharmacological activities and signaling of new morphinans substituted in position 6 with acrylonitrile and amido functions as potent agonists and antinociceptive agents interacting with MOP receptors. We show that the presence of a 6-cyano group in N-methylmorphinans has a strong influence on the binding to the opioid receptors and post-receptor signaling. One 6-cyano-N-methylmorphinan of the series was identified as the highest affinity and most selective MOP agonist, and very potent in stimulating G protein coupling and intracellular calcium release through the MOP receptor. In vivo, this MOP agonist showed to be greatly effective against thermal and chemical nociception in mice with marked increased antinociceptive potency than the lead molecule oxycodone.

conclusionDevelopment of such novel chemotypes by targeting position 6 provides valuable insights on ligand-receptor interaction and molecular mode of action, and may aid in identification of opioid therapeutics with enhanced analgesic properties and fewer undesirable effects.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsCalciumCell LineCricetulusDose-Response Relationship, DrugGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)MaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRMorphinansPain MeasurementPain ThresholdProtein BindingRatsAnalgesics, OpioidCalciumGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)MorphinansReceptors, Opioid, muSulfur Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID25059282
PMCPMC4121618
OpenAlexW2161173380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.