Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25059276›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2015

A tale worth telling: the impact of the diagnosis experience on disclosure of genetic disorders.

J Goodwin, K Schoch, V Shashi, S R Hooper, O Morad, M Zalevsky, D Gothelf, L E Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J GoodwinUniversity of Newcastle, School of Psychology, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
K Schoch
V Shashi
S R Hooper
O Morad
M Zalevsky
D Gothelf
L E Campbell

Funding

Risk Factors for Psychosis in Chromosome 22q11 Deletion SyndromeR01MH078015 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHASHI, VANDANA · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
"4/5 International Consortium on Brain and Behavior in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome"U01MH101722 · NIMH · KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN · PI SWILLEN, ANN · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS 5U01MH101722-02NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078015NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH101722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests children with genetic disorders exhibit greater coping skills when they are aware of their condition and its heritability. While the experiences parents have at diagnosis may influence their decision to disclose the diagnosis to their children, there is little research into this communication. The aim of the current study was to examine the relationship between the diagnosis experience and the disclosure experience for parents of children with developmental disorders of a known genetic aetiology: parents of children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) were compared with a group of parents with children affected with other genetic diagnoses, with a similar age of diagnosis (e.g. fragile X syndrome) and a group where diagnosis generally occurs early (i.e. Down syndrome).

methodThe sample comprised 559 parents and caregivers of children with genetic developmental disorders, and an online survey was utilised. Items from the questionnaire were combined to create variables for diagnosis experience, parental disclosure experience, child's disclosure experience, and parental coping and self-efficacy.

resultsAcross all groups parents reported that the diagnosis experience was negative and often accompanied by a lack of support and appropriate information. Sixty-eight per cent of those in the 22q11DS and 58.3% in the Similar Conditions groups had disclosed the diagnosis to their child, whereas only 32.7% of the Down syndrome group had. Eighty-six per cent of the Down syndrome group felt they had sufficient information to talk to their child compared with 44.1% of the Similar Conditions group and 32.6% of the 22q11DS group. Parents reported disclosing the diagnosis to their child because they did not want to create secrets; and that they considered the child's age when disclosing. In the 22q11DS and Similar Conditions groups, a poor diagnosis experience was significantly associated with negative parental disclosure experiences. In the Similar Conditions group, a poor diagnosis experience was also significantly associated with a more negative child disclosure experience.

conclusionsAs expected this study highlights how difficult most parents find the diagnosis experience. Importantly, the data indicate that the personal experiences the parents have can have a long-term impact on how well they cope with telling their child about the diagnosis. It is important for clinicians to consider the long-term ramifications of the diagnosis experience and give the parents opportunities; through, for instance, psychoeducation to prepare for telling their child about the diagnosis. Further research is warranted to explore what type of information would be useful for parents to receive.

Indexed as

22q11 Deletion SyndromeDown SyndromeFragile X SyndromePrader-Willi SyndromeTruth DisclosureTuberous SclerosisAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfantInfant, Newborn22q11.2 deletion syndrome and familiesdiagnostic disclosure in genetic conditionsdisclosure of diagnostic information to childrenparental perceptions of diagnostic experiencevelo-cardio-facial syndrome and families

Identifiers

PMID25059276
PMCPMC4305500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.