ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Quantifying the length and variance of the eukaryotic cell cycle phases by a stochastic model and dual nucleoside pulse labelling.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lineage topology, replication kinetics and cell cycle synchronization reveal regulated growth dynamics in human bone marrow stromal cell colonies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cell division timing shapes the morphology and size of nascent multicellular organisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Optimizing scheduling in dual-pulse nucleoside labeling experiments for cell-cycle analysis.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Cell Population Dynamics Informed by Cell-Cycle Regulation: A Deterministic Modeling Toolkit.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Unmasking complex kinetics in viral entry by inferring hypoexponential models.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Probabilistic modeling of cell cycle dynamics in response to cell cycle targeting chemotherapy drugs to guide treatment strategies.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Genetic modeling of ELP1-associated Sonic hedgehog medulloblastoma identifies MDM2 as a selective therapeutic target.Cancer cell · 2025Article
- Characterising the Behaviour of a Structured PDE Model of the Cell Cycle in Contrast to a Corresponding ODE System.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Quantifying cell cycle regulation by tissue crowding.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Fluctuations in tissue growth portray homeostasis as a critical state and long-time non-Markovian cell proliferation as Markovian.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Neural network and kinetic modelling of human genome replication reveal replication origin locations and strengths.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Dynamics and consequences of the HTLV-1 proviral plus-strand burst.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- Characterization of naked mole-rat hematopoiesis reveals unique stem and progenitor cell patterns and neotenic traits.The EMBO journal · 2022Article
- Counting generations in birth and death processes with competing Erlang and exponential waiting times.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Measuring S-Phase Duration from Asynchronous Cells Using Dual EdU-BrdU Pulse-Chase Labeling Flow Cytometry.Genes · 2022Article
- Modeling the Dynamics of T-Cell Development in the Thymus.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A novel mathematical model of heterogeneous cell proliferation.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Reoccurring neural stem cell divisions in the adult zebrafish telencephalon are sufficient for the emergence of aggregated spatiotemporal patterns.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- FGF2 modulates simultaneously the mode, the rate of division and the growth fraction in cultures of radial glia.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fundamental property of cell populations is their growth rate as well as the time needed for cell division and its variance. The eukaryotic cell cycle progresses in an ordered sequence through the phases G1, S, G2, and M, and is regulated by environmental cues and by intracellular checkpoints. Reflecting this regulatory complexity, the length of each phase varies considerably in different kinds of cells but also among genetically and morphologically indistinguishable cells. This article addresses the question of how to describe and quantify the mean and variance of the cell cycle phase lengths. A phase-resolved cell cycle model is introduced assuming that phase completion times are distributed as delayed exponential functions, capturing the observations that each realization of a cycle phase is variable in length and requires a minimal time. In this model, the total cell cycle length is distributed as a delayed hypoexponential function that closely reproduces empirical distributions. Analytic solutions are derived for the proportions of cells in each cycle phase in a population growing under balanced growth and under specific non-stationary conditions. These solutions are then adapted to describe conventional cell cycle kinetic assays based on pulse labelling with nucleoside analogs. The model fits well to data obtained with two distinct proliferating cell lines labelled with a single bromodeoxiuridine pulse. However, whereas mean lengths are precisely estimated for all phases, the respective variances remain uncertain. To overcome this limitation, a redesigned experimental protocol is derived and validated in silico. The novelty is the timing of two consecutive pulses with distinct nucleosides that enables accurate and precise estimation of both the mean and the variance of the length of all phases. The proposed methodology to quantify the phase length distributions gives results potentially equivalent to those obtained with modern phase-specific biosensor-based fluorescent imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.