Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25058766›Full record

ArticleInternational surgery

Surgery for diverticulitis: a re-evaluation of the changing trends.

Tafadzwa P Makarawo, Steffan Eichenauer, Uma Shah, Amy Jaeger, Alasdair McKendrick, Vijay K Mittal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tafadzwa P MakarawoDepartment of Surgery, Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Southfield, Michigan, USA.
Steffan Eichenauer
Uma Shah
Amy Jaeger
Alasdair McKendrick
Vijay K Mittal
Providence Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical management of diverticulitis continues to evolve but recent literature has not qualified just how different current practice is compared with the previous era. This study aims to update the seminal paper by Rodkey and Welch regarding indications and operation types performed for diverticulitis by comparing their findings with present practice at a community based institution. The charts of 407 patients admitted with "diverticular disease" between 2005 and 2010 were identified. For each admission, patients' demographics, presentations and management were recorded. Direct comparisons were made with results from the study by Rodkey and Welch. Of the 407 admissions studied, the distribution was 335 emergency and 72 elective. Medical management alone treated 90% of emergency admissions, while 4% required additional radiologic intervention. Emergency surgery was necessary in only 6% of cases with Hartmann's procedure being the most common procedure. Recurrent diverticulitis was a prime indication for elective surgery with 96% of cases undergoing a 1-staged procedure. Compared with the previous era, the nonoperative approach to managing acute diverticulitis is now applied for the vast majority of admissions. Improved success in medically temporizing patients in the present era has allowed for a higher percentage of successful single-staged elective surgeries.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDiverticulitis, ColonicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDiverticulitisSurgery

Identifiers

PMID25058766
PMCPMC4114362
OpenAlexW1998936486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.