ArticlePLoS genetics2014
Functional diversification of hsp40: distinct j-protein functional requirements for two prions allow for chaperone-dependent prion selection.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unique characteristics of the J-domain proximal regions of Hsp70 cochaperone Apj1 in prion propagation/elimination and its overlap with Sis1 function.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Identification of subfunctionalized aggregate-remodeling J-domain proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Human J-Domain Protein DnaJB6 Protects Yeast from [Biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Review
- Differential Interactions of Molecular Chaperones and Yeast Prions.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Yeast J-protein Sis1 prevents prion toxicity by moderating depletion of prion protein.Genetics · 2021Article
- How Do Yeast Cells Contend with Prions?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Three J-proteins impact Hsp104-mediated variant-specific prion elimination: a new critical role for a low-complexity domain.Current genetics · 2020Review
- Truncating biallelic variant in DNAJA1, encoding the co-chaperone Hsp40, is associated with intellectual disability and seizures.Neurogenetics · 2019Article
- Review
- Review
- [PIN+]ing down the mechanism of prion appearance.FEMS yeast research · 2018Review
- Variant-specific and reciprocal Hsp40 functions in Hsp104-mediated prion elimination.Molecular microbiology · 2018Article
- Differential effects of chaperones on yeast prions: CURrent view.Current genetics · 2018Review
- Genetic variation in N- and C-terminal regions of bovineJournal of genomics · 2018Article
- Chaperone functional specificity promotes yeast prion diversity.PLoS pathogens · 2018Article
- Broadening the functionality of a J-protein/Hsp70 molecular chaperone system.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Evolutionary Conservation and Emerging Functional Diversity of the Cytosolic Hsp70:J Protein Chaperone Network ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Yeast prions are heritable amyloid aggregates of functional yeast proteins; their propagation to subsequent cell generations is dependent upon fragmentation of prion protein aggregates by molecular chaperone proteins. Mounting evidence indicates the J-protein Sis1 may act as an amyloid specificity factor, recognizing prion and other amyloid aggregates and enabling Ssa and Hsp104 to act in prion fragmentation. Chaperone interactions with prions, however, can be affected by variations in amyloid-core structure resulting in distinct prion variants or 'strains'. Our genetic analysis revealed that Sis1 domain requirements by distinct variants of [PSI+] are strongly dependent upon overall variant stability. Notably, multiple strong [PSI+] variants can be maintained by a minimal construct of Sis1 consisting of only the J-domain and glycine/phenylalanine-rich (G/F) region that was previously shown to be sufficient for cell viability and [RNQ+] prion propagation. In contrast, weak [PSI+] variants are lost under the same conditions but maintained by the expression of an Sis1 construct that lacks only the G/F region and cannot support [RNQ+] propagation, revealing mutually exclusive requirements for Sis1 function between these two prions. Prion loss is not due to [PSI+]-dependent toxicity or dependent upon a particular yeast genetic background. These observations necessitate that Sis1 must have at least two distinct functional roles that individual prions differentially require for propagation and which are localized to the glycine-rich domains of the Sis1. Based on these distinctions, Sis1 plasmid-shuffling in a [PSI+]/[RNQ+] strain permitted J-protein-dependent prion selection for either prion. We also found that, despite an initial report to the contrary, the human homolog of Sis1, Hdj1, is capable of [PSI+] prion propagation in place of Sis1. This conservation of function is also prion-variant dependent, indicating that only one of the two Sis1-prion functions may have been maintained in eukaryotic chaperone evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.