Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25058446›Full record

ArticleToxicology and applied pharmacology2014

Prediction of binding affinity and efficacy of thyroid hormone receptor ligands using QSAR and structure-based modeling methods.

Regina Politi, Ivan Rusyn, Alexander Tropsha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chemical Screening of Nuclear Receptor Modulators.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Alarms about structural alerts.Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Regina PolitiLaboratory for Molecular Modeling, Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Ivan RusynDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: iir@unc.edu.
Alexander TropshaLaboratory for Molecular Modeling, Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: alex_tropsha@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

PREDICTIVE QSAR MODELINGR01GM066940 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TROPSHA, ALEXANDER · 2003 to 2011
$3.0M
Chembench: the Integrated Web Portal to Accelerate Cheminformatics and Chemical GR01GM096967 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI POZEFSKY, DIANE, TROPSHA, ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Robust computational framework for predictive ADME-Tox modelingR21GM076059 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TROPSHA, ALEXANDER · 2006 to 2008
$1000k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076059NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066940NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096967NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM076059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thyroid hormone receptor (THR) is an important member of the nuclear receptor family that can be activated by endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC). Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models have been developed to facilitate the prioritization of THR-mediated EDC for the experimental validation. The largest database of binding affinities available at the time of the study for ligand binding domain (LBD) of THRβ was assembled to generate both continuous and classification QSAR models with an external accuracy of R(2)=0.55 and CCR=0.76, respectively. In addition, for the first time a QSAR model was developed to predict binding affinities of antagonists inhibiting the interaction of coactivators with the AF-2 domain of THRβ (R(2)=0.70). Furthermore, molecular docking studies were performed for a set of THRβ ligands (57 agonists and 15 antagonists of LBD, 210 antagonists of the AF-2 domain, supplemented by putative decoys/non-binders) using several THRβ structures retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. We found that two agonist-bound THRβ conformations could effectively discriminate their corresponding ligands from presumed non-binders. Moreover, one of the agonist conformations could discriminate agonists from antagonists. Finally, we have conducted virtual screening of a chemical library compiled by the EPA as part of the Tox21 program to identify potential THRβ-mediated EDCs using both QSAR models and docking. We concluded that the library is unlikely to have any EDC that would bind to the THRβ. Models developed in this study can be employed either to identify environmental chemicals interacting with the THR or, conversely, to eliminate the THR-mediated mechanism of action for chemicals of concern.

Indexed as

Quantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, FactualForecastingLigandsProtein BindingReceptors, Thyroid HormoneThyroid HormonesLigandsReceptors, Thyroid HormoneThyroid HormonesDockingEndocrine disrupting chemicalsQuantitative Structure–Activity Relationships modelingThyroid hormone receptorVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID25058446
PMCPMC4814443
OpenAlexW2059922911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.