Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25058321›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Medication incidents related to automated dose dispensing in community pharmacies and hospitals--a reporting system study.

Ka-Chun Cheung, Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Marcel L Bouvy, Michel Wensing, Peter A G M De Smet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Approaches to outpatient pharmacy automation: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multidose Drug Dispensing in Community Healthcare Settings for Patients With Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ka-Chun CheungScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Patricia M L A van den BemtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel L BouvyDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michel WensingScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter A G M De SmetScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), Den Haag, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLPharmo Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutomated dose dispensing (ADD) is being introduced in several countries and the use of this technology is expected to increase as a growing number of elderly people need to manage their medication at home. ADD aims to improve medication safety and treatment adherence, but it may introduce new safety issues. This descriptive study provides insight into the nature and consequences of medication incidents related to ADD, as reported by healthcare professionals in community pharmacies and hospitals.

methodsThe medication incidents that were submitted to the Dutch Central Medication incidents Registration (CMR) reporting system were selected and characterized independently by two researchers.

main outcome measuresPerson discovering the incident, phase of the medication process in which the incident occurred, immediate cause of the incident, nature of incident from the healthcare provider's perspective, nature of incident from the patient's perspective, and consequent harm to the patient caused by the incident.

resultsFrom January 2012 to February 2013 the CMR received 15,113 incidents: 3,685 (24.4%) incidents from community pharmacies and 11,428 (75.6%) incidents from hospitals. Eventually 1 of 50 reported incidents (268/15,113 = 1.8%) were related to ADD; in community pharmacies more incidents (227/3,685 = 6.2%) were related to ADD than in hospitals (41/11,428 = 0.4%). The immediate cause of an incident was often a change in the patient's medicine regimen or relocation. Most reported incidents occurred in two phases: entering the prescription into the pharmacy information system and filling the ADD bag.

conclusionA proportion of incidents was related to ADD and is reported regularly, especially by community pharmacies. In two phases, entering the prescription into the pharmacy information system and filling the ADD bag, most incidents occurred. A change in the patient's medicine regimen or relocation was the immediate causes of an incident.

Indexed as

PharmaciesPrescription DrugsAgedAged, 80 and overAutomationContraindicationsFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMedication ErrorsMedication SystemsMiddle AgedNetherlandsRisk ManagementPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID25058321
PMCPMC4109935
OpenAlexW2155374161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.