Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057987›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2015

The quality imperative for palliative care.

Arif H Kamal, Laura C Hanson, David J Casarett, Sydney M Dy, Steven Z Pantilat, Dale Lupu, Amy P Abernethy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-Level Factors Impacting Implementation of Outpatient Palliative Care: Perceptions of VA Providers.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using Natural Language Processing to Classify Serious Illness Communication with Oncology Patients.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arif H KamalDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: arif.kamal@duke.edu.
Laura C HansonDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
David J CasarettDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sydney M DyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Steven Z PantilatPalliative Care Program, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dale LupuCenter for Aging, Health and Humanities, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Amy P AbernethyDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Refinement and Expansion of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC)U24NR014637 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTNER, JEAN S, POLLAK, KATHRYN I · 2013 to 2017
$9.6M
Implementing best practice in palliative careR18HS022763 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KIMBERLY S. · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
AHRQ HHS R18HS022763-01NINR NIH HHS U24 NR014637NINR NIH HHS U24NR014637-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative medicine must prioritize the routine assessment of the quality of clinical care we provide. This includes regular assessment, analysis, and reporting of data on quality. Assessment of quality informs opportunities for improvement and demonstrates to our peers and ourselves the value of our efforts. In fact, continuous messaging of the value of palliative care services is needed to sustain our discipline; this requires regularly evaluating the quality of our care. As the reimbursement mechanisms for health care in the U.S. shift from fee-for-service to fee-for-value models, palliative care will be expected to report robust data on quality of care. We must move beyond demonstrating to our constituents (including patients and referrers), "here is what we do," and increase the focus on "this is how well we do it" and "let us see how we can do it better." It is incumbent on palliative care professionals to lead these efforts. This involves developing standardized methods to collect data without adding additional burden, comparing and sharing our experiences to promote discipline-wide quality assessment and improvement initiatives, and demonstrating our intentions for quality improvement on the clinical frontline.

Indexed as

Palliative CareQuality of Health CareHealth Care ReformHumansResearch DesignUnited Statespalliative careQuality

Identifiers

PMID25057987
PMCPMC4405112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.