Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057905›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Intrapopulation genome size variation in D. melanogaster reflects life history variation and plasticity.

Lisa L Ellis, Wen Huang, Andrew M Quinn, Astha Ahuja, Ben Alfrejd, Francisco E Gomez, Carl E Hjelmen, Kristi L Moore, Trudy F C Mackay, J Spencer Johnston and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative genetics of trauma induced mortality inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa L EllisDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Wen HuangDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Andrew M QuinnDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Astha AhujaBaylor Human Genome Sequencing Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Ben AlfrejdDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Francisco E GomezDepartment of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Carl E HjelmenDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Kristi L MooreDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Trudy F C MackayDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
J Spencer JohnstonDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Aaron M TaroneDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined female genome sizes using flow cytometry for 211 Drosophila melanogaster sequenced inbred strains from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel, and found significant conspecific and intrapopulation variation in genome size. We also compared several life history traits for 25 lines with large and 25 lines with small genomes in three thermal environments, and found that genome size as well as genome size by temperature interactions significantly correlated with survival to pupation and adulthood, time to pupation, female pupal mass, and female eclosion rates. Genome size accounted for up to 23% of the variation in developmental phenotypes, but the contribution of genome size to variation in life history traits was plastic and varied according to the thermal environment. Expression data implicate differences in metabolism that correspond to genome size variation. These results indicate that significant genome size variation exists within D. melanogaster and this variation may impact the evolutionary ecology of the species. Genome size variation accounts for a significant portion of life history variation in an environmentally dependent manner, suggesting that potential fitness effects associated with genome size variation also depend on environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenome SizeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEnvironmentFemaleGenetic VariationGenome, InsectInsect Hormoneseclosion hormoneInsect Hormones

Identifiers

PMID25057905
PMCPMC4109859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.