Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057864›Full record

ReviewCNS oncology2012

Pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: can optimism replace pessimism?

Darren Hargrave

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Children: Techniques and Applications.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Darren HargraveDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK. darren.hargrave@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) has a dismal prognosis that has not seen a change in outcome despite multiple clinical trials. Possible reasons for failure to make progress in this aggressive childhood brain tumor include: poor understanding of the underlying molecular biology due to lack of access to tumor material; absence of accurate and relevant DIPG preclinical models for drug development; ill-defined therapeutic targets for novel agents; and inadequate drug delivery to the brainstem. This review will demonstrate that systematic studies to identify solutions for each of these barriers is starting to deliver progress that can turn pessimism to optimism in DIPG.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain Stem NeoplasmsChildClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalDrug Delivery SystemsGliomaHumans

Identifiers

PMID25057864
PMCPMC6176841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.