Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057376›Full record

ReviewJRSM open2014

Invasive candidiasis in intensive care unit; consensus statement from an Iranian panel of experts, July 2013.

Arezoo Ahmadi, Seyed Hossein Ardehali, Mohammad Taghi Beigmohammadi, Mahboubeh Hajiabdolbaghi, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian, Mehran Kouchek, Ali Majidpour, Majid Mokhtari, Omid Moradi Moghaddam, Atabak Najafi and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JRSM open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Frequency and co-colonization of vancomycin-resistantNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
  4. Candidemia in ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Invasive candidiasis in non neutropenic critically ill - need for region-specific management guidelines.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2015
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Arezoo AhmadiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Hossein ArdehaliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Taghi BeigmohammadiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahboubeh HajiabdolbaghiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad Reza HashemianDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Masih-Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehran KouchekDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali MajidpourDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Majid MokhtariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonology, Critical Care Unit, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Omid Moradi MoghaddamDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Atabak NajafiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza NejatDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad NiakanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hossein LotfiIntensive Care Unit, Laleh Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Ali AmirsavadkouhiIranian Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad ShirazianIntensive Care Unit, Vali-e-Asr Hospital, NAJA University, Tehran, Iran.
Payam TabarsiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Masih-Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahshid Talebi TaherDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Torabi-NamiDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran ; Behphar Scientific Committee, Behphar Group, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRMasih Daneshvari Hospital · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRImam Hossein Hospital · IRImam Khomeini Hospital · IRRasool Akram Hospital · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is associated with high mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Timely diagnosis of this potentially fatal condition remains a challenge; on the other hand, the criteria for initiating empirical antifungal therapy in critically ill patients are not well defined in different patient population and ICU settings. Alongside the international guidelines, reaching regional and local consensus on diagnosis and management of IC in ICU setting is essential. This report summarizes our present status of IC management in ICU, considered by a group of Iranian experts in the fields of intensive care and infectious diseases. A round table of 17 experts was held to review the available data and discuss the optimal treatment strategies for IC in critical care setting. Comparative published data on the management of IC were analytically reviewed and the commonly asked questions about the management of IC in ICU were isolated. These questions were interactively discussed by the panel and audience responses were taken to consolidate point-to-point agreement with the panel arriving at consensus in many instances. The responses indicated that patients' risk stratification, clinical discretion, fungal diagnostic techniques and the empirical therapy for IC are likely to save more patients. Treatment options were recommended to be based on the disease severity, prior azole exposure, and the presence of suspected azole-resistant Candida species. This report was reviewed, edited and discussed by all participants to include further evidence-based insights. The panel expects such endorsed recommendations to be soon formulated for implementation across the country.

Indexed as

intensive care unitinvasive candidiasisIranlocal consensustherapy

Identifiers

PMID25057376
PMCPMC4012669
OpenAlexW2155230513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.