Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057341›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2014

MR to CT Registration of Brains using Image Synthesis.

Snehashis Roy, Aaron Carass, Amod Jog, Jerry L Prince, Junghoon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-modality brain tumor segmentation using dual-attention generative adversarial network.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Virtual contrast enhancement for CT scans of abdomen and pelvis.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Abdominopelvic MR to CT registration using a synthetic CT intermediate.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022
    Article
  7. Deep Learning for Synthetic CT from Bone MRI in the Head and Neck.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Generation of annotated multimodal ground truth datasets for abdominal medical image registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluating the Impact of Intensity Normalization on MR Image Synthesis.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Snehashis RoyCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Henry M. Jackson Foundation.
Aaron CarassImage Analysis and Communications Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University.
Amod JogImage Analysis and Communications Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University.
Jerry L PrinceImage Analysis and Communications Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University.
Junghoon LeeRadiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
Johns Hopkins University · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · US

Funding

Multimodal image registration by proxy image synthesisR01EB017743 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2013 to 2015
$1.0M
MR Image Example-based Contrast Synthesis for Consistent Image AnalysisR21EB012765 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2011 to 2012
$430k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017743NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB012765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging modality for patient dose calculation for radiation therapy. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) is used along with CT to identify brain structures due to its superior soft tissue contrast. Registration of MR and CT is necessary for accurate delineation of the tumor and other structures, and is critical in radiotherapy planning. Mutual information (MI) or its variants are typically used as a similarity metric to register MRI to CT. However, unlike CT, MRI intensity does not have an accepted calibrated intensity scale. Therefore, MI-based MR-CT registration may vary from scan to scan as MI depends on the joint histogram of the images. In this paper, we propose a fully automatic framework for MR-CT registration by synthesizing a synthetic CT image from MRI using a co-registered pair of MR and CT images as an atlas. Patches of the subject MRI are matched to the atlas and the synthetic CT patches are estimated in a probabilistic framework. The synthetic CT is registered to the original CT using a deformable registration and the computed deformation is applied to the MRI. In contrast to most existing methods, we do not need any manual intervention such as picking landmarks or regions of interests. The proposed method was validated on ten brain cancer patient cases, showing 25% improvement in MI and correlation between MR and CT images after registration compared to state-of-the-art registration methods.

Indexed as

brainCThallucinationhistogram matchingimage synthesisintensity normalizationmagnetic resonance imagingMRIpatches

Identifiers

PMID25057341
PMCPMC4104818
OpenAlexW2081599679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.