Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2014

Factors affecting the levels of protection transferred from mother to offspring following immune challenge.

Christina M Coakley, Vincent Staszewski, Katherine A Herborn, Emma Ja Cunningham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Testing hypotheses for maternal effects in Daphnia magna.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina M CoakleyCentre for Infection, Immunity and Evolution, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biology, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
Vincent StaszewskiCentre for Infection, Immunity and Evolution, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biology, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
Katherine A HerbornCentre for Infection, Immunity and Evolution, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biology, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
Emma Ja CunninghamCentre for Infection, Immunity and Evolution, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biology, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe transfer of antibodies from mother to offspring is key to protecting young animals from disease and can have a major impact on responses to infection and offspring fitness. Such maternal effects also allow young that may be exposed to disease in early life to focus resources on growth and development at this critical period of development. Maternally transferred antibodies are therefore an important source of phenotypic variation in host phenotype as well as influencing host susceptibility and tolerance to infection across generations. It has previously been assumed the transfer of antibodies is passive and invariant and reflects the level of circulating antibody in the mother at the time of transfer. However, whether females may vary in the relative amount of protection transferred to offspring has seldom been explored.

resultsHere we show that females differ widely in the relative amount of specific blood antibodies they transfer to the embryonic environment (range 9.2%-38.4% of their own circulating levels) in Chinese painted quail (Coturnix chinensis). Relative transfer levels were unrelated to the size of a female's own immune response. Furthermore, individual females were consistent in their transfer level, both across different stages of their immune response and when challenged with different vaccine types. The amount of antibody transferred was related to female condition, but baseline antibody responses of mothers were not. However, we found no evidence for any trade-offs between the relative amount of antibody transferred with other measures of reproductive investment.

conclusionsThese results suggest that the relative amount of antibodies transferred to offspring can vary significantly and consistently between females. Levels of transfer may therefore be a separate trait open to manipulation or selection with potential consequences for offspring health and fitness in both wild and domesticated populations.

Indexed as

Differential allocationEcoimmunologyImmunityMaternal antibodiesMaternal effectTrade-offs

Identifiers

PMID25057280
PMCPMC4096548
OpenAlexW2164661697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.