Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057270›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of otolaryngology2014

Treatment of Vertigo: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Ginkgo biloba Extract EGb 761 and Betahistine.

Larysa Sokolova, Robert Hoerr, Tamara Mishchenko

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of otolaryngology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03219515 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Safety, Effectiveness, and Cost-effectiveness of an Herbal Medicine, Gongjin-dan, in Subjects With Chronic Dizziness: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKyunghee UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled78ConditionsDizziness ChronicArmsGongjin-Dan, Placebo
NCT05932979 phase2withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Administration of L-arginine vs. Placebo on the vHIT Result, Vestibular Caloric Tests and Symptoms of Patients Diagnosed With Presbyvestibulopathy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentro Universitario de TonaláRan2023 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsPresbyvestibulopathyArmsL-arginine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in neurology
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of EGb 761Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Migrainous Vertigo, Tinnitus, and Ear Symptoms and Alternatives.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. A Herbal Medicine,Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Article
  9. Efficacy and safety ofNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Larysa SokolovaFaculty of Neurology, Bohomolets National Medical University, Shevchenko Avenue, 13, Kiev 01601, Ukraine.
Robert HoerrClinical Research Department, Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG, Willmar-Schwabe-Straße 4, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-7679
Tamara MishchenkoInstitute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the NAMS of Ukraine SI, 46, Akademika Pavlova Street, Kharkiv 61068, Ukraine.
Dr Willmar Schwabe (Germany) · DEInstitute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multicenter clinical trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 and betahistine at recommended doses in patients with vertigo. One hundred and sixty patients (mean age 58 years) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with EGb 761 (240 mg per day) or betahistine (32 mg per day) for 12 weeks. An 11-point numeric analogue scale, the Vertigo Symptom Scale-short form, the Clinical Global Impression Scales and the Sheehan Disability Scale were used as outcome measures. Both treatment groups were comparable at baseline and improved in all outcome measures during the course of treatment. There was no significant intergroup difference with regard to changes in any outcome measure. Numerically, improvements of patients receiving EGb 761 were slightly more pronounced on all scales. Clinical global impression was rated "very much improved" or "much improved" in 79% of patients treated with EGb 761 and in 70% receiving betahistine. With 27 adverse events in 19 patients, EGb 761 showed better tolerability than betahistine with 39 adverse events in 31 patients. In conclusion, the two drugs were similarly effective in the treatment of vertigo, but EGb 761 was better tolerated. This trial is registered with controlled-trials.com ISRCTN02262139.

Identifiers

PMID25057270
PMCPMC4099171
OpenAlexW2150867543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.