Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057194›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Additive gene-environment effects on hippocampal structure in healthy humans.

Ulrich Rabl, Bernhard M Meyer, Kersten Diers, Lucie Bartova, Andreas Berger, Dominik Mandorfer, Ana Popovic, Christian Scharinger, Julia Huemer, Klaudius Kalcher and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ulrich RablDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard M MeyerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Kersten DiersDepartment of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Lucie BartovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Andreas BergerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Dominik MandorferDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ana PopovicDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christian ScharingerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Julia HuemerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Klaudius KalcherMR Center of Excellence, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering.
Gerald PailDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Helmuth HaslacherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-2503
Thomas PerkmannDepartment of Laboratory Medicine.
Christian WindischbergerMR Center of Excellence, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9944-0190
Burkhard BrockeDepartment of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Harald H SitteCenter of Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-7444
Daniela D PollakDepartment of Neurophysiology and Neuropharmacology, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Jean-Claude DreherNeuroeconomics Laboratory: Reward and Decision-Making, Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Unité Mixte de Recherche 5229, 69500 Bron, France, and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2157-1529
Siegfried KasperDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Nicole Praschak-RiederDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ewald MoserMR Center of Excellence, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering.
Harald EsterbauerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine.
Lukas PezawasDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria, lukas.pezawas@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1329-6352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal volume loss has been related to chronic stress as well as genetic factors. Although genetic and environmental variables affecting hippocampal volume have extensively been studied and related to mental illness, limited evidence is available with respect to G × E interactions on hippocampal volume. The present MRI study investigated interaction effects on hippocampal volume between three well-studied functional genetic variants (COMT Val158Met, BDNF Val66Met, 5-HTTLPR) associated with hippocampal volume and a measure of environmental adversity (life events questionnaire) in a large sample of healthy humans (n = 153). All three variants showed significant interactions with environmental adversity with respect to hippocampal volume. Observed effects were additive by nature and driven by both recent as well as early life events. A consecutive analysis of hippocampal subfields revealed a spatially distinct profile for each genetic variant suggesting a specific role of 5-HTTLPR for the subiculum, BDNF Val66Met for CA4/dentate gyrus, and COMT Val158Met for CA2/3 volume changes. The present study underscores the importance of G × E interactions as determinants of hippocampal volume, which is crucial for the neurobiological understanding of stress-related conditions, such as mood disorders or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionHealth StatusLife Change EventsAdolescentAdultFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleOrgan SizeYoung AdultBDNFCOMThippocampusMRISLC6A4stress

Identifiers

PMID25057194
PMCPMC4107408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.