Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25057111›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

GWAS and drug targets.

Chen Cao, John Moult

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Big Data in Gastroenterology Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Repurposing Drugs to Treat Heart and Brain Illness.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen Cao
John Moult

Funding

Analysis of the Functional Impact of Coding Region SNPsR01LM007174 · NLM · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MOULT, JOHN · 2001 to 2010
$2.5M
Morphogenetic Tissue Movements in Early EmbryosR01GM102801 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CZIROK, ANDRAS · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
Identification and in vitro experimental investigation of missense SNPs implicateR01GM102810 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HERZBERG, OSNAT, MOULT, JOHN · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Mechanisms underlying complex trait human diseaseR01GM104436 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MOULT, JOHN · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM102801NIGMS NIH HHS GM104436NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102810NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104436NLM NIH HHS LM007174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed a large number of links between genome variation and complex disease. Among other benefits, it is expected that these insights will lead to new therapeutic strategies, particularly the identification of new drug targets. In this paper, we evaluate the power of GWAS studies to find drug targets by examining how many existing drug targets have been directly 'rediscovered' by this technique, and the extent to which GWAS results may be leveraged by network information to discover known and new drug targets.

resultsWe find that only a very small fraction of drug targets are directly detected in the relevant GWAS studies. We investigate two possible explanations for this observation. First, we find evidence of negative selection acting on drug target genes as a consequence of strong coupling with the disease phenotype, so reducing the incidence of SNPs linked to the disease. Second, we find that GWAS genes are substantially longer on average than drug targets and than all genes, suggesting there is a length related bias in GWAS results. In spite of the low direct relationship between drug targets and GWAS reported genes, we found these two sets of genes are closely coupled in the human protein network. As a consequence, machine-learning methods are able to recover known drug targets based on network context and the set of GWAS reported genes for the same disease. We show the approach is potentially useful for identifying drug repurposing opportunities.

conclusionsAlthough GWA studies do not directly identify most existing drug targets, there are several reasons to expect that new targets will nevertheless be discovered using these data. Initial results on drug repurposing studies using network analysis are encouraging and suggest directions for future development.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyDiseaseDrug Delivery SystemsGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, HumanHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID25057111
PMCPMC4083410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.