ArticleBMC genomics2014
GWAS and drug targets.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic Association of Lipids and Lipid Drug Targets With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Meta-analysis.JAMA cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Unveiling novel drug targets for atherosclerosis: A Mendelian randomization analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Robustness Analyses Substantially Narrow in silico Network-Toxicology Signals Linking Selected Pharmaceuticals and Caffeine to Vitiligo.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Linking Genome-Wide Association Studies to Pharmacological Treatments for Psychiatric Disorders.JAMA psychiatry · 2025Article
- Review
- Genome-wide association studies: utility and limitations for research in physiology.The Journal of physiology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine-learning approaches in structure and ligand-based discovery of drugs affecting central nervous system.Molecular diversity · 2023Review
- Big Data in Gastroenterology Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Polygenic Risk Score Knowledge Base offers a centralized online repository for calculating and contextualizing polygenic risk scores.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Clinical Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: Protocol.Translational stroke research · 2022Article
- Identifying causal genes for depression via integration of the proteome and transcriptome from brain and blood.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- Mapping the gene network landscape of Alzheimer's disease through integrating genomics and transcriptomics.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Identifying Novel Psoriatic Disease Drug Targets Using a Genetics-Based Priority Index Pipeline.Journal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis · 2021Article
- Genome editing to define the function of risk loci and variants in rheumatic disease.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021Review
- Repurposing Drugs to Treat Heart and Brain Illness.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Identifying drug candidates for hepatocellular carcinoma based on differentially expressed genes.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Are drug targets with genetic support twice as likely to be approved? Revised estimates of the impact of genetic support for drug mechanisms on the probability of drug approval.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Genome-wide association studies and genetic testing: understanding the science, success, and future of a rapidly developing field.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2019Review
- Re-thinking Alzheimer's disease therapeutic targets using gene-based tests.EBioMedicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenome wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed a large number of links between genome variation and complex disease. Among other benefits, it is expected that these insights will lead to new therapeutic strategies, particularly the identification of new drug targets. In this paper, we evaluate the power of GWAS studies to find drug targets by examining how many existing drug targets have been directly 'rediscovered' by this technique, and the extent to which GWAS results may be leveraged by network information to discover known and new drug targets.
resultsWe find that only a very small fraction of drug targets are directly detected in the relevant GWAS studies. We investigate two possible explanations for this observation. First, we find evidence of negative selection acting on drug target genes as a consequence of strong coupling with the disease phenotype, so reducing the incidence of SNPs linked to the disease. Second, we find that GWAS genes are substantially longer on average than drug targets and than all genes, suggesting there is a length related bias in GWAS results. In spite of the low direct relationship between drug targets and GWAS reported genes, we found these two sets of genes are closely coupled in the human protein network. As a consequence, machine-learning methods are able to recover known drug targets based on network context and the set of GWAS reported genes for the same disease. We show the approach is potentially useful for identifying drug repurposing opportunities.
conclusionsAlthough GWA studies do not directly identify most existing drug targets, there are several reasons to expect that new targets will nevertheless be discovered using these data. Initial results on drug repurposing studies using network analysis are encouraging and suggest directions for future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.