Reducing racial disparity in colorectal cancer burden.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Racial and geographic disparities in stage-specific incidence and mortality in the colorectal cancer hotspot region of eastern North Carolina, 2008-2016.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021
   Article
2. Mediating Effects of Frailty Indicators on the Risk of Sepsis After Cancer.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2020
   Article
3. A prospective study of cancer survivors and risk of sepsis within the REGARDS cohort.Cancer epidemiology · 2018
   Article
4. Cancer-related risk factors and incidence of major cancers by race, gender and region; analysis of the NIH-AARP diet and health study.BMC cancer · 2017
   Article
5. Availability of Healthcare Resources and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Among Non-Hispanic White and Non-Hispanic Black Adults.Journal of community health · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Whites and blacks have similar risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia.2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as