Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25056688›Full record

ArticleChild development

Does learning to read improve intelligence? A longitudinal multivariate analysis in identical twins from age 7 to 16.

Stuart J Ritchie, Timothy C Bates, Robert Plomin

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Child development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Children's cognitive performance and suicide risk through middle adulthood.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stuart J RitchieThe University of Edinburgh.
Timothy C Bates
Robert Plomin

Funding

Genetics, School environments and cognitive developmentR01HD044454 · NICHD · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI PLOMIN, ROBERT · 2005 to 2014
$3.4M
Genetics of Mathematical Cognition and DisabilitiesR01HD059215 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PETRILL, STEPHEN A. · 2009 to 2012
$2.4M
Medical Research Council G0500079Medical Research Council G0901245Medical Research Council G19/2NICHD NIH HHS HD044454NICHD NIH HHS HD059215NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044454NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from twin studies points to substantial environmental influences on intelligence, but the specifics of this influence are unclear. This study examined one developmental process that potentially causes intelligence differences: learning to read. In 1,890 twin pairs tested at 7, 9, 10, 12, and 16 years, a cross-lagged monozygotic-differences design was used to test for associations of earlier within-pair reading ability differences with subsequent intelligence differences. The results showed several such associations, which were not explained by differences in reading exposure and were not restricted to verbal cognitive domains. The study highlights the potentially important influence of reading ability, driven by the nonshared environment, on intellectual development and raises theoretical questions about the mechanism of this influence.

Indexed as

ReadingTwins, MonozygoticAdolescentChildChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansIntelligenceLearningLongitudinal StudiesMaleMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25056688
PMCPMC4354297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.