Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25056410›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2014

[Improvement of emergency physician education through simulator training. Consideration on the basis of the model project "NASimSaar25"].

W Armbruster, D Kubulus, T Schlechtriemen, J Adler, M Höhn, D Schmidt, S Duchêne, P Steiner, T Volk, M Wrobel

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Specific aspects of pediatric emergencies in the prehospital setting].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

W ArmbrusterKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikums des Saarlandes, Gebäude 57, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland, Werner.Armbruster@uniklinikum-saarland.de.
D Kubulus
T Schlechtriemen
J Adler
M Höhn
D Schmidt
S Duchêne
P Steiner
T Volk
M Wrobel
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEFeuerwehr Dortmund · DEKlinikum Saarbrücken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehospital emergency medicine is a challenge for trainee emergency physicians. Rare injuries and diseases as well as patients in extreme age groups can unexpectedly face emergency physicians. In the regulations on medical education the German Medical Association requires participation in 50 emergency missions under the supervision of an experienced emergency physician. This needs to be improved because on-the-job training does not generally represent the whole spectrum of emergency medicine and a good and structured training under on call conditions is nearly impossible.

aimThe subject of the model project described was whether practical training for emergency physicians can be achieved by participation in simulation training instead of real emergency situations. MATERIAL AND

methodsAfter modification of the Saarland regulations on medical education it was possible to replace up to 25 participations in emergency missions by simulation training. The concept of the course NASimSaar25 requires participants to complete 25 simulator cases in 3 days in small training groups. Emergency situations from all medical disciplines need to be treated. A special focus is on the treatment of life-threatening and rare diseases and injuries. Modern simulators and actors are used. The debriefings are conducted by experienced tutors based on approved principles. Medical contents, learning targets from the field of crew resource management (CRM) and soft skills are discussed in these debriefings.

resultsEducation in the field of emergency medicine can be improved by simulator-based learning and training. However, practical work under a tutor in real and clinical experience cannot be completely replaced by simulation. Simulator training can only be successful if theoretical knowledge has already been acquired.

conclusionA simulator-based course concept can result in an improvement of emergency medical education. The model project NASimSaar25 was well received by the target audience and mostly very well evaluated in terms of learning and reality. If this project becomes established the demand on simulation-based training will increase. The training should achieve a consistent standard of quality.

Indexed as

Patient SimulationPhysiciansClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationCurriculumEmergency MedicineGermanyHumansInservice Training

Identifiers

PMID25056410
OpenAlexW302023748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.