Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25056331›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene PCR sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study.

Pascale Bémer, Chloé Plouzeau, Didier Tande, Julie Léger, Bruno Giraudeau, Anne Sophie Valentin, Anne Jolivet-Gougeon, Pascal Vincent, Stéphane Corvec, Sophie Gibaud and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current Clinical Challenges.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Pascale BémerCHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France pascale.bemer@chu-nantes.fr.
Chloé PlouzeauCHU Poitiers, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Poitiers, France.
Didier TandeCHU Brest, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Brest, France.
Julie LégerINSERM, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Bruno GiraudeauINSERM, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Anne Sophie ValentinCHU Tours, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Tours, France.
Anne Jolivet-GougeonCHU Rennes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Rennes, France.
Pascal VincentCHU Rennes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Rennes, France.
Stéphane CorvecCHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France.
Sophie GibaudCHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France.
Marie Emmanuelle JuvinCHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France.
Genevieve Héry-ArnaudCHU Brest, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Brest, France.
Carole LemariéCHU Angers, Angers, France.
Marie KempfCHU Angers, Angers, France.
Laurent BretCHU Orléans, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Orléans, France.
Roland QuentinCHU Tours, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Tours, France.
Carine CoffreINSERM, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Gonzague de PinieuxCHU Tours, Laboratoire d'Anatomo-Pathologie, Tours, France.
Louis BernardCHU Tours, Service des Maladies Infectieuses, Tours, France.
Christophe BurucoaCHU Poitiers, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Référence des Infections Ostéo-articulaires du Grand Ouest (CRIOGO) Study Team
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRClinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no standard method for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The contribution of 16S rRNA gene PCR sequencing on a routine basis remains to be defined. We performed a prospective multicenter study to assess the contributions of 16S rRNA gene assays in PJI diagnosis. Over a 2-year period, all patients suspected to have PJIs and a few uninfected patients undergoing primary arthroplasty (control group) were included. Five perioperative samples per patient were collected for culture and 16S rRNA gene PCR sequencing and one for histological examination. Three multicenter quality control assays were performed with both DNA extracts and crushed samples. The diagnosis of PJI was based on clinical, bacteriological, and histological criteria, according to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. A molecular diagnosis was modeled on the bacteriological criterion (≥ 1 positive sample for strict pathogens and ≥ 2 for commensal skin flora). Molecular data were analyzed according to the diagnosis of PJI. Between December 2010 and March 2012, 264 suspected cases of PJI and 35 control cases were included. PJI was confirmed in 215/264 suspected cases, 192 (89%) with a bacteriological criterion. The PJIs were monomicrobial (163 cases [85%]; staphylococci, n = 108; streptococci, n = 22; Gram-negative bacilli, n = 16; anaerobes, n = 13; others, n = 4) or polymicrobial (29 cases [15%]). The molecular diagnosis was positive in 151/215 confirmed cases of PJI (143 cases with bacteriological PJI documentation and 8 treated cases without bacteriological documentation) and in 2/49 cases without confirmed PJI (sensitivity, 73.3%; specificity, 95.5%). The 16S rRNA gene PCR assay showed a lack of sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI on a multicenter routine basis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBacterial InfectionsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesOsteoarthritisPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesProsthesis-Related InfectionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25056331
PMCPMC4187742
OpenAlexW2118821738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.