Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25055836›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2015

Rehabilitative training promotes rapid motor recovery but delayed motor map reorganization in a rat cortical ischemic infarct model.

Mariko Nishibe, Edward T R Urban, Scott Barbay, Randolph J Nudo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Micro-ultrasound based characterization of cerebrovasculature following focal ischemic stroke and upon short-term rehabilitation.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Post-Ischemic Reorganization of Sensory Responses in Cerebral Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariko NishibeOsaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Edward T R UrbanUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Scott BarbayUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Randolph J NudoUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA rnudo@kumc.edu.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USOsaka University · JP

Funding

REORGANIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX FOLLOWING BRAIN INJURYR01NS030853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NUDO, RANDOLPH J. · 1993 to 2020
$6.5M
Reorganization of motor cortex following brain injuryR37NS030853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NUDO, RANDOLPH J. · 2008 to 2014
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS030853NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS030853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn preclinical stroke models, improvement in motor performance is associated with reorganization of cortical motor maps. However, the temporal relationship between performance gains and map plasticity is not clear.

objectiveThis study was designed to assess the effects of rehabilitative training on the temporal dynamics of behavioral and neurophysiological endpoints in a rat model of focal cortical infarct.

methodsEight days after an ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex, adult rats received either rehabilitative training or were allowed to recover spontaneously. Motor performance and movement quality of the paretic forelimb was assessed on a skilled reach task. Intracortical microstimulation mapping procedures were conducted to assess the topography of spared forelimb representations either at the end of training (post-lesion day 18) or at the end of a 3-week follow-up period (post-lesion day 38).

resultsRats receiving rehabilitative training demonstrated more rapid improvement in motor performance and movement quality during the training period that persisted through the follow-up period. Motor maps in both groups were unusually small on post-lesion day 18. On post-lesion day 38, forelimb motor maps in the rehabilitative training group were significantly enlarged compared with the no-rehab group, and within the range of normal maps.

conclusionsPostinfarct rehabilitative training rapidly improves motor performance and movement quality after an ischemic infarct in motor cortex. However, training-induced motor improvements are not reflected in spared motor maps until substantially later, suggesting that early motor training after stroke can help shape the evolving poststroke neural network.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBrain IschemiaCerebral InfarctionDisease Models, AnimalElectric StimulationEndothelin-1ForelimbMaleMotor ActivityPhysical Conditioning, AnimalPsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, Long-EvansRecovery of FunctionEndothelin-1cerebral cortexLong-Evansneuronal plasticityratsrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID25055836
PMCPMC4303553
OpenAlexW2157774606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.