ReviewCNS oncology2014
The fine structure of ependymomas.
Review in CNS oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- AOSNP-ADAPTR resource level-based recommendations on practical diagnostic strategies for ependymomas.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CAR-T cell therapy in brain malignancies: obstacles in the face of cellular trafficking and persistence.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Review
- Super-resolution of biomedical volumes with 2D supervision.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops · 2024Article
- CNS tumors with PLAGL1-fusion: beyond ZFTA and YAP1 in the genetic spectrum of supratentorial ependymomas.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
- The Continuing Value of Ultrastructural Observation in Central Nervous System Neoplasms in Children.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electron microscopy is a useful diagnostic technique in order to confirm or establish a definitive diagnosis in brain tumors that may have an atypical histological pattern, which requires a concrete diagnosis. In ependymomas, electron microscopy reveals morphological characters that have a pathognomonic diagnostic value, therefore allowing a definitive diagnosis. The main fine structural criteria of ependymomas consist of the numerous microvilli and cilia, which are incorporated in the cell body or extended freely in the intracellular space; the centriole or blepharoplast, which is located in the basis of the cilia; the large number of the fragmented microtubules in the perikaryon and the cellular processes (any small cellular projection into the neutrophil or intracellular space); the junctional apparatus between the cells, such as zonula adherens, zonula occludens and puncta adherentia; the basement membrane-like structure, seen in papillary ependymomas and ependymomas of the filum terminale; and the elongated cells in the loose intracellular space, commonly seen in myxopapillary ependymomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.