ArticleCNS oncology2013
IFN-α for recurrent surgery- and radiation-refractory high-grade meningioma: a retrospective case series.
Article in CNS oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic therapy in the treatment of recurrent or refractory intracranial meningiomas: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Benchmarking the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies for recurrent meningioma: A RANO group systematic review and meta-analysis to guide clinical trial design.Neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Noncoding RNA landscape and their emerging roles as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in meningioma.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Signaling pathways in brain tumors and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Emerging systemic treatment options in meningioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- Clinical Significance of Molecular Alterations and Systemic Therapy for Meningiomas: Where Do We Stand?Cancers · 2022Review
- Identification and Management of Aggressive Meningiomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Synthesizing Molecular and Immune Characteristics to Move Beyond WHO Grade in Meningiomas: A Focused Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Meningioma: not always a benign tumor. A review of advances in the treatment of meningiomas.CNS oncology · 2021Review
- Multimodal management of surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas: an analysis of the French national tumor board meeting on meningiomas cohort.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Primary and Secondary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2021Article
- Meningioma: A Review of Clinicopathological and Molecular Aspects.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- A Retrospective Interventional Cohort Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Sandostatin LAR for Treatment of Recurrent and/or Refractory Meningiomas.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Mebendazole and radiation in combination increase survival through anticancer mechanisms in an intracranial rodent model of malignant meningioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- An overview of meningiomas.Future oncology (London, England) · 2018Review
- Longitudinal experience with WHO Grade III (anaplastic) meningiomas at a single institution.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimLimited literature is available regarding the treatment of recurrent surgery- and radiation-refractory meningioma, and it primarily examines the treatment of low-grade (WHO grade 1) meningioma. Data regarding systemic therapy for recurrent high-grade meningioma are sparse. A retrospective case series of patients with recurrent WHO grade 2/3 meningioma treated with IFN-α following progression after surgery, radiotherapy and hydroxyurea was carried out, with the primary study objective of overall response rate, and median and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS &
methods35 patients (28 women and 17 men; median age 63 years; range: 36-86 years) with recurrent high-grade meningioma (WHO grade 2 [n = 22] or 3 [n = 13]) were treated with IFN-α (10 million units/m(2)) subcutaneously every 2 days; one cycle was operationally defined as 4 weeks of IFN-α. Patients had progressed radiographically after prior therapy with surgery (35 out of 35), radiotherapy (35 out of 35; external-beam radiotherapy: 35 out of 35; and stereotactic radiotherapy: 34 out of 35) and hydroxyurea chemotherapy (35 out of 35). One patient was also treated with a somatostatin analog before initiating IFN-α treatment.
resultsPatients received one to 13 cycles (median: three) of IFN-α with moderate toxicity (100% of patients manifested grades 1-3 toxicity, of which only 20% were grade 3). There were no radiographic responses, 63% of patients had stable disease and 37% manifested progressive disease at first evaluation. PFS was 17% at 6 months (95% CI: 0.07-0.31; median PFS: 12 weeks; 95% CI: 8-20 weeks; range: 4-52 weeks). Following progression on IFN-α, the majority of patients (60%) were subsequently treated on an alternative therapy.
conclusionIn this large retrospective series, IFN-α was moderately toxic, but appeared to have limited activity in patients with recurrent high-grade meningiomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.